Threat to director confirmed indictment against Haxhi Shala

The Appeals Court has confirmed the indictment against Haxhi Shala, the former president of the Social Democrat Initiative. He is charged with the words “ma you owe a blood”, Ahmet Morina, director of the Directorate for Urbanism in the Malisheva municipality, reports “Justice Trust”. Under the decision, provided by the “Justice Vow”, Apel has rejected it as unfounded [...]
He is charged with the words “ma you owe a blood”, Ahmet Morina, director of the Directorate for Urbanism in the Malisheva municipality, reports “Justice Trust”.
Under the decision, provided by “Justice Vowtim”, Apel has rejected the appeal of accused Shala's defender, lawyer Dzevdet Smakqi, submitted against the Constitutional Court's act in Gjakova, the branch in Malisheva, in terms of controversy and a request to cast the indictment.
The first-instance court with the act of October 14, 2021, had refused the request to drop the indictment filed by the defender Shala, arguing that the indictment is based and based on acceptable evidence, and neither of the evidence has been taken contrary to legal provisions.
Against this act, within the legal term the complaint has exercised the defender of the accused Shala, the Smakqi lawyer, due to the substantial violation of the procedure's provisions and the wrong and incomplete confirmation of the actual situation.
The same one has proposed that the Court of Appeals approve the complaint as based, the complaining decision to change it so as to drop the indictment exercised against Shala.
On the other hand, the paralytic Appeals prosecutor has proposed that the defendant's defender's complaint be turned down as baseless, while the complaining decision be confirmed.
While, Apeli after reviewing all the subject papers in this criminal case has found the lawyer's complaint Smakqi is not based.
“According to this court's assessment, the defendant's earlier complaint claims in this direction are not based, the act of court of first degree that has been rejected of evidence and the request to drop the indictment exercised by the defendant's protector is based, is fair and legal, the same is no offense for which the “complaint has been alleged, in Apel's decision, provided by “The judge for Justice<3x>.
In the continuation of the Appeals Court's reasoning, the college of this court has reportedly estimated that in the concrete case, the indictment as such is compiled in accordance with Article 241, paragraph 1, of the Penal Procedure Code, and the same does not contain shortcomings that enable the continuation of the criminal procedure.
Otherwise, former delegation Shala was declared innocent at the initial session held on September 1st, 2021.
The Act, founded on July 2nd 2021 by the Constitutional Prosecutor in Gjakova, charges Haxhi Shala that in August 2020 at the Municipal Assembly in Malisheva, seriously the official person, director of the Directorate for Urbanism in the Malisheva Community, Ahmet Morina.
The indictment is said to have done so with the purpose of intimidation and causing anxiety, as he injured Morina makes a decision to cancel the consent with which he allowed the company <x0YIIi Miral” to regulate the documentation with the intent of using the quadastral area of Gayrak,
According to the accuser, the accused Shala first threatens him by telephone and then goes to the damaged office, addressing me with the words “you've damaged a million euros I invested in, you've seen the fight, if you don't withdraw the decision, by Friday, you owe me a” blood.
Always in accordance with the indictment, on Friday the injured person is informed that three persons have been in the municipality and have been asking about him and afraid of the accused's words and interest of those people, the injured goes to the police, and that is when the accused calls the injured, asking whether he has withdrawn the decision and with these acts of injury causes concern and fear.
For this, Shala is accused of committing criminal work “Canosja” by Article 181, paragraph 3, concerning paragraph 1 of the Penal Code, which is punishable by imprisonment of six months to five years. /Betimy for Justice










