Oil parties caused clashes at the Headship Meeting: Everything that happened there

The head of the Assembly, Glauk Konjufca, before the media, has said his staff chief in the published script has not mentioned names.

 I've read the staff chief's reaction, I've seen a reaction in principle, he didn't mention any names, I think all the names that were coveted then aren't from the chief of staff, but they're from the media and from certain portals that Mr. Gashi has taken as a personal attack. There was also a domestic insult, an expression that cannot be mentioned”, Conjufca said.

While in his statement, LDK MP chief Arben Gashi has said there have been no physical clashes and that there has been a high distance with the chief of the chief of the head parliament.

 I haven't even touched it by hand and I've had a relatively high distance with it, it's not true. So the Speaker of the Parliament must carry out his duties, be at the head of his post as representative of the Parliament and all the deputies of the Parliament, and not activate his cabinet chief to misuse the situation of incorrect information at the expense of MPs”, Gashi said.

Gashi has said that the Assembly of the Parliament's leadership has failed because of the presence of the chief of staff of Konjufca, of whom he has said he has committed violations of his duties and responsibilities.

 “The provision of the Assembly's leadership failed because the Speaker of the Parliament had taken away the cabinet chief who has committed violations of his duties and responsibilities. We asked him not to be present, the mayor refused to leave and the meeting failed. The chief of the cabinet, except that it has told lies, has used partial truths by trying to denigrate the appointed deputies of the Republic Assembly of”, Gashi has said.

According to Gashi, no cabinet chief speaks without his boss' permission.

Gashi's behaviour has been criticised by the Vetevendosje Movement's parliamentary group.

MP Adnan Rrustemi has said there were direct threats there.

 Besides condemning such irresponsibly highly irresponsible behaviour, direct threats, of course I would like to make known the stance of Vetevendosje Movement, the proposal we intended to submit to the chairmanship of the Parliament, in terms of the necessity that the chairmanship of the assembly completely review the 2011 chairmanship decision regarding the compensation of deputies”, Krustemi said.

Yesterday, the chief of the Konjufca staff, Ilir Cresley, wrote in his account that “A LDK deputy who in the media was declared to have not received a salary for travel, from 2011 to 2013 has spent on the 10,440 euros in derivatives”.

Regarding the 2011 decision, which covers MPs' travel expenses to the Assembly, Konjufca has said they will handle this point once it comes to office.

 “As soon as this appears at the chairmanship meeting, we will treat with optimism that it would take the votes of other political subjects that have so far said they do not support such a decision by at least two political subjects so far I have seen, two parliamentary subjects which do not support a decision for MPs because, according to their explanation, this happened in 2011 to have an equality between MPs, so in terms of their expenses, those who live outside Pristina, in distant towns like Gjakova or Prizren or other cities, and the MPs who live near Pristina, who have been able to take part of their work without spending and say it.

While the Vetevendosje Movement group has stated they will give up these compensations, adding that the decision on additions should be revised overall.

 This compensation was unnecessary, too for Kosovo's Parliament deputies, however it is necessary to identify or need the eventual cases that have given the incorrect address by other MPs who, as part of the salary, have received compensation for travel”, MP Adnan Rrustemi has said.

Days ago in the media have been published the names of deputies and the amount for derivatives they have spent to participate in the work of the Parliament, the expenses that have been covered by this institution with a 2011 decision.

In addition, some MPs had taken advantage of this ruling, at the same time, why the same were settled in Pristina.