44 minutes agoThe difference between “K ESCO explains calculations for this month
Periskopi(4 years ago)
(4 years ago)K E SCO has announced that from Friday (February 18th) it has started with regular reading of the consumer situation for February and, respectively, sending new bills. ECCO reportedly has been calculated and divided before February 9th and February 9th (new calendars). According to KESCO, [...]
According to KESCO, Z approved bill design RHRA has adapted to the needs of the billing according to changes in the new fee structure.
“Also, consumers in “Net” address the total expense. However, because new tariffs have entered into force on February 9th, and the share spent before February 9th is estimated at old tariffs, in the “Fatstal” address the obligation consumers have for payment, and the same is lower than the value presented in the address presented in the APUo”, the statement said.
K ESCO reports that the difference between “Neto” and “Fatal Total” is the result of the consumption estimate with old tariffs before February 9th and the bloc's zero rating from February 9th, despite spending that consumers have made until February 9th.
This difference, according to KESCO, is explained at the bottom of the bill, textual (written), including the days old tariffs have been applied for.
“From future receipts the reckoning will be much simpler and since the entire month will be done according to new tariffs, values between the articles TVScha and bill level will be equal. To make it easier to read the bill and the logic of the calculator, the KESCO website has integrated into the form of a calculator where the consumer will place the data, with which the receipts will be generated in the details of the last bill including the divide of the kilowats before and after February 9th, the calculation of each kilowat with the corresponding price, as well as the sum of lucky kilowats in the bloc with a set-up of <18x> is said away.
