Minister Hajdari on official trip, child crash hearing canceled

According to Judge Valbone Gjonbalaj, Minister Hajdari is on an official trip to Albania and that the same November 2nd has announced to the court that she will not be present at the session.

“We will not hold the session because the Premier has announced the court with argumentable evidence, because of its position, is at an official meeting in the Republic of Albania”, Judge Gjonbalaj has said of “the Justice Vowy”.

The judge further added lack of minister Hajdari has argued with invitations the same one has received on the visit, while saying all sides have been announced.

The November 1st “has been invited by the tribunal, while the announcement has been released on November 2nd, the other parties have also been recognised, all have been of reconciliation”, she stressed.

At this session, it was meant to participate in forensic expert as well as a communications expert, the judge said that at the next session, the parties would be invited with regular invitations.

Otherwise, at the last session, Minister Hajdari had said that he was not guilty of the accident where a child was hit, according to her, she had been at speed within the communications rules and that suddenly the girl was hit by the car after the same girl was running.

Otherwise, the request to defendant Hajdari for the initiative of the counter-invention procedure was made by the Kosovo police station, the Kosovo Police Regional Road Communications Unit, for the accident that took place on 10 April 2022, about 12:25 on the “Vicianum”, in Pristina's “Arberia” neighbourhood.

At the same request, Hajdari was tasked with “Speed non-recognition” and “Accur communication with body injury”.

Meanwhile, for “Justice Trust”, the representative of the damaged party, lawyer Florim Shefqeti, had said they appreciated that the communications expert would determine the position of the defendant, which, according to the video, was seen as being on the left side, while its direction of the movement was the right arm.

He said the prosecution had to first define the speed of moving ahead of the case's instructions on counter-insulting.

And also, from the subject paperwork has been the rainfall route and from the speed of movement seen in the video, we expect what was normally required to make the prosecution determine the speed of moving and adapting the speed of movement and weather conditions on the road, and this will define whether we have to do more against it or are dealing with criminal work. Similarly, we think that the prosecutor of the case had to clear up this situation before he could point out the case for the Anti-Avention Department”, said attorney Shefqeti.