Miftarians expose VV Street: Government's decision to cut salaries conflicts with Venice Commission

Through a post in his Facebook account, Miftaraj has reminded VV deputy of the position they had as a party regarding the salaries of state officials.

Somebody tell the respected MP Adnan Rrustemi, what was the VV's position, near the Constitutional Court, regarding the establishment and lowering of salaries of state officials. The following picture is the case of VV near GRK.
According to the VV, at that time and fairly rightly, only the Assembly has the capacity to decide on the salaries of state officials through the law, and this competence is not of the government that by rulings set up or dropped the salaries of judges and prosecutors”, it has written among other things.

virt Miftar also criticised Kurti's advisers, who, according to him, are advising me to adopt a decision like this about lowering the salaries of judges and prosecutors, which is contrary to the Venice Commission's standards.

Kurti's decision of government abolishs the DK act. That's a comment. The lawyer of the first year also realizes that this is illegal.
Kurti's decision is contrary to standards set by the Venice Commission, that the salaries of judges and prosecutors cannot be dropped with executive decisions by the government.
Honored MP, problem is not IKD, the problem is with Prime Minister Kurti's advisors advising him to adopt such a decision. The problem is with you who don't reflect, you're looking guilty to the guardian for your mistakes”, he said.

His full post:

Let someone tell respected MP Adnan Rrustemi, what was the VV's position, at the Constitutional Court, regarding the establishment and lowering of state officials' salaries. The following picture is the case of VV near GRK.
According to the VV, at that time and fairly rightly, only the Assembly has the competence to decide on the salaries of state officials through the law, and that authority is not within the government's reach of verdicts or lowers the salaries of judges and prosecutors.
IKD was consistent. He reacted against the ruling decision. Haradinaj for salary increases. He has reacted and declined to comply with the ruling by KK, which has legalised the ruling on Haradinaj.
Anyway, The IKD never gives itself the right to make a public invitation not to apply the decisions of fair or constitutional courts. Even though we have not agreed with the JC's decision, that decision is a valid law and must be implemented.
Kurti's decision abolishs the DK's court. That's a comment. The lawyer of the first year also realizes that this is illegal.
Kurti's decision is contrary to standards set by the Venice Commission, that the salaries of judges and prosecutors cannot be dropped with executive decisions by the government.
Honored MP, problem is not IKD, the problem is with Prime Minister Kurti's advisors advising him to adopt such a decision. The problem is you who don't reflect, you're looking guilty for custody for your mistakes.
Or maybe the chief of the EU Office and yesterday's reaction to the government's decision is wrong and has agendas against you.