Visar Ymer receives the shocking electricity bill for January: 383 euros runs expensive

He says the value of the bill with the price of electricity amounts to 383 euros and 6 cents.

Ymer begins writing with the clarifications: 

RIVING REAL ME WILLI 161.8%

The power plant for the month of January was distributed yesterday (in the residential complex where I live). For this month I had spent 1543 That's on the expensive A1 fee, and 1024. A.2. The value of this monthly fat is 146.32 euros, which includes TVS (10.80 euros) as well as fixed fees (1.74 euros). When it calculates the same expense with the tariffs proposed by ZRGEE, the bill's value amounts to 383.06 euros. This then comes down to 266.61 euros after the provisional application made available by the Government of the Republic of Kosovo. So the bill that today costs 146.32 euros will cost 383.06 euros after 1 February, if the tariff proposal becomes the decision. The difference is 236.74 euros or expressed in percentage growth is 161.8 %”, Ymer writes.

On the other hand, Ymer elaborizes the power subsidies issue, which of course, will be paid by our taxes/money:

The subvention significantly reduces the bill's cost. But let's not forget that subsidies are also paid by us, taxpayers. Moreover, if the tariffs are set, they will remain the same until April 2023. So it will cover the remaining winter months and energy crisis, spring and summer months, and more importantly, the winter months 2022-2023”, writes Ymer, Periscope.

Then Ymer has some questions:

“will also continue subsidy in each of these periods?

Or in the winter of 2022-2023 will we pay our rent directly and not brokered through the budget?

And will it be the same expensive price of import as it is then today?

And will we still have generation problems as we do today?

In a word, energy tariffs are being expensive to deal with the energy crisis and the generation we have today, and they're extending, artificially, the same circumstances for a much longer period, when the same circumstances in the electricity supply system are not expected anymore.

Now the government has repeatedly advised us to save energy. And that's where I was given that right. We have to save. I heat up with electricity. We're not connected to the central heating network.

Then what's the heat?

With wood burning? If we imagine once that anyone who warms up with the current goes into the wood. Or coal. What would happen to the price of wood? What about coal? What about the environment?

Would forests not be destroyed? And the air, also polluted, wouldn't it overload with coal burning?

Even with subsidy, says Ymer, still no passage to never account:

But we can warm up less. Okay. Suppose 1/3 of consumption and unnecessary excess. If 1543 instead I spend 1028 on expensive fees. That's 1024 instead. I only spend 682 Well, the price is still too high. So I would pay 233.03 euros, which, currently due to subsidies, would be dropped to 165.99 euros. I still have no account of how my calculator” is being cut out, he writes. /Periscope