New Study: Subdependent omitron more contagious than original

Between December and January, a study was conducted to analyze the spread of the coronary infection into over 8,500 Danish families.

The study showed that the probability of people infected with the BA.2 subvarian to infect others around them is 33 percent higher than those infected with the version BA.1.

The study also showed that subdependent <x0-original” BA.1 causes more than 98 percent of omicron infections, but its relative “” BA.2 soon became the dominant type in Denmark, ousting BA.1 from the throne in the second week of January.

We conclude that Omitron BA.2 is evidently more transmitted than BA.1, and at the same time there are factors that bypass the immune system and thus further reduce the protective effect of anti-mocation COVID” said scientists conducting the study.

The study, which has not yet passed the review of colleagues, was conducted by scientists from the state institute Serrum (SSI), colleagues from the Copenhagen University and the Danish Bureau of Statistics and the Danish Technical University.

If you were exposed to the BA.2 subvarians in your family, the probability of getting infected with it within a week is 39 percent. The vaccines continue to play an important role. If you were exposed to BA.1 instead of BA.2, the probability of infection would be 29 percent within a week,” said lead researcher and author Frederick Plesner, adding that the findings indicate that BA.2 about 33 percent more contagious than BA.1.

Omitron BA.2's subsurgent cases have also been reported in the United States, Great Britain, Sweden and Norway, but to a much smaller extent than Denmark, where they make up about 82 percent of all reported cases.

The study also showed that BA.2 was relatively more successful than BA.1 when it came to infecting people with two doses and those who received an additional strengthening dose.

This is evidence that this Navrian has factors that bypass the immune system even more successfully than the previous ones.

Scientists repeat that vaccines continue to play a vital role in protecting individuals.

The study showed that even in this case they were completely vaccinated, and especially those who received a strengthening dose were less susceptible to infection and virus transmission compared with those who had not been vaccinated.

The SSI preliminary analysis showed that there is no difference in the risk of hospitalization of infected persons with the BA.2 subvariane compared to those infected with BA.1.