He stole the money from his father and threatened to kill him, and the Court decides for the gylanas.

According to the Court, he had stolen from his father once 100 euros and another 50 euros.

“Se on January 18th, in Prizren, respectively, in his home, with the aim of illegally taking over the property of the injured parent, in the way that by exploiting the convenient moment when no one was in the house, entered his parent's room and dealt with a lot of 100 euros, while the next day again taking advantage of the convenient moment of dealt with the amount of money from 50 euros, which comes out and spends in the city of<1>

When the father and brother had learned of his actions and had asked where he spent his money, he had threatened them with murder if they called the police.

When, on January 19th, exactly in his family home, the defendant with a view to intimidation, seriously tell other people, in words he's going to cause some harm to his father and brother, in the way that after the injured ones realize that the defendant has taken the parent's money without his knowledge, when he comes home and asks the defendant where he spent it, but he revolts and tries to attack his brother, but there he intervenes his parent, and yet the defendant continues with the same words of the <x> when he calls out of the police, when I have killed you with the police, but I have caused the same revolt and the anxiety of their brother, but there's been what happened in the situation.

Full communication:

The Constitutional Court in Prizren, the General Department, procedure Judge Fatmir Krasniqi, has scheduled the detention measure for thirty-30 days, which will be counted from the time of the arrest of 19,01.2022 and can last until 19,02.2022, against indictees C.K., due to suspicion of committing criminal acts, from Article 313 par. One and another 181 pars. Four tied to money. 2 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo.

The court, in case of the detention measure against the defendants, has estimated that there are legal reasons for the appointment of the detention measure, and from evidence collected until this stage, is of suspicion based:

That on January 18th, in Prizren, respectively, in his home, with the intention of illegally profiting himself from the property of his deceased parent, in the way that by using the convenient moment when no one was at home, he entered his parent's room and took the money in a lot of 100 euros, while the next day again using the convenient moment he took the money to a lot of 50 euros, which comes out and spends in the city.

And on January 19, exactly in his family home, the defendant with the intention of intimidation seriously takes other people out, in words he'll do some harm to his father and brother, in a way that after those injured realize that the defendant finds out

He's got the parent's money without his knowledge, and when he comes home they ask the defendant where he spent the money, but the same revolts and tries to attack his brother, but that's where his parent comes in and stops him, but the defendant goes on asking the same thing as if you call the police when I get out of the police, I've got to wipe you out, with what has caused the injury, anxiety and uncertainty about their lives.

Will these facts be argued, however, in the further stages of criminal procedure.

In the case of the detention, the Court has taken into account the fact that criminal investigations are in the initial phase and with the release of indictees to freedom, there is the danger that the same would prevent the normal course of this criminal procedure, also by taking on the basis of the manner and circumstances in which criminal acts were committed, there is danger that with the release of indictees to freedom or against having the detention appointed to him, the same could repeat the same criminal work, and could end the ongoing criminal work, but could also carry out some of the worst criminal act of nature with the worst consequences for the victims and damage to the family.

From tops, the Court has concluded that in the concrete case of the detention is necessary and reasonable, for the regular and normal development of criminal procedure, in view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above, the way and circumstances of carrying out criminal work, so the Court decided on the extent of the detention measure to the defendant in length of (1) month.