VV mayor candidate confirmed indictment

He is accused of throwing tear gas into the Kosovo Assembly and obstructing official persons in carrying out official office, reports the “Justice Trust”.

In the decision, which has provided “Justice Vow”, it is said that the Constitutional Court in Pristina has rejected it as unbased and unreserved in the real situation the requirement for dropping the indictment and rejecting evidence exercised by defender Ramadani, lawyer Naser Soopyan.

Under this ruling, the court has found that defence claims are unstable, unexplained and unremitted in any concrete reason.

The decision reportedly does not maintain defence claims that, in the concrete case, the essential conditions of criminal acts “are not met in the use of weapons or dangerous tools” and “Pegim of the official person, in carrying out official task”.

After carefully looking into the related state and evidence, the court found that the request for the drop of the mentioned indictment should be denied, as if not based on the real state and the related evidence, because the collected evidence provides sufficient basis for well-founded doubt that the accused committed the criminal acts that are placed on the burden, and there is the basis for establishing the actual indictment, while the proposed evidence in the indictment and protection of the court will assess in the judiciary, what request to cast the act has been denied to the <18x>, the decision was issued by the <2x> of the justice <2>

Contacted by “Justice bet”, defender of accused Ramadani, lawyer Naser Soopyan has said the first degree ruling is not fair.

“Vlerating that this court ruling is not fair and that the arguments presented in defence request of” are not fully analysed.

He said this way of deciding at this stage has become the practice of the court.

There's been a court practice when, at this stage, the court usually decides that way. To be honest, we've been awaiting such a court ruling, because it's enough for him when he reasons with the phase that the proposed evidence in the indictment and their assessment, as well as the court's defence, will do in chief consideration. Again, in this case, we have such reasoning”, Soopyan stated.

In the end, the lawyer has announced that regarding this decision, they will file complaints at the Court of Appeals.

Otherwise, at the initial session held on 13 July, MP Valon Ramadani has been declared innocent of the criminal acts he is tasked with.

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, on July 30, 2019, has filed an indictment against Valon Ramadani, with the reasoning that he committed two criminal acts and “the use of a dangerous weapon or tool”, from Article 375, CPRC's paragraph 1, as well as for “obstruction of the official person, in carrying out the official task”, from Article 409, paragraph 1 KPRC.

According to the accusation, on March 21, 2018, in Pristina, exactly in the Republic of Kosovo Assembly Hall, accused Ramadani, deputy of the Republic of Kosovo's Parliament, in violation of the applicable law on arms, has used weapons in the manner he has lit up and thrown a tear gas tank during the development of the extraordinary session.

The accusation is said to have prevented officials from carrying out official positions, Kosovo's Parliament deputies, in time, the country, and the highest manner, the accused Ramadani has, respectively, from using tear gas and the work of an extraordinary session of the RKS Parliament. /Betimy for Justice