I told “havan” analyst in the debate: Halil Matosh seeks public forgiveness

There have been tensions between analysts Halil Matoshi and Krenar Shala in last night's debate on Canal10. In an ongoing discussion about the governance of Prime Minister Albin Kurti, Matoshi has named <x0);hevan” analyst Krenar Shala, but for that, he has immediately apologized on the show, and today he has also done so through an apology [...]
In an ongoing discussion about the governance of Prime Minister Albin Kurti, Matoshi has named <x0);hevan” analyst Krenar Shala, but for that, he has immediately apologized on the show, and today he has also done so through a public apology on Facebook.
Matoshi has said he apologises to viewers and analyst Krenar Shala after addressing him in words of question, which he says he did without any intention.
He says he feels bad for calling Shala so and says he respects everyone's free opinion and even more so says Shala has been correct with her.
Matosh's complete apology:
Pardon Crenar Shala
Proud Shala and the Canal 10 viewers tonight I apologized to them, in front of the TV cameras, because I'm led to an offensive word, although in my memory I have a chronic lack of hatred of other people.
We always feel a moral debt to ask for absolution here too, on our Facebook profile.
Because of the inappropriate and insulting expression, <x0ajvan”, underlined during the controversy in Politikom with Sadik Consumption, unannounced, I feel sincerely sorry before Crenaar, which we often disagree with, but we have no interpersonial answer.
Not only do I accept his unconventional right to suggest his opinion, but I admit I'm wrong because Crenari doesn't deserve any kind of insult, because he's usually right with me.
P.S.
Forgiveness, in its daily conclusion, is a mechanism that fixes a relationship after a mistake that is correct among people, so it is not a fatal mistake!
You're supposed to be sorry: You become a better man or woman...











