What did Astroth Brother Ademij say before the Prosecution, and what is his state of health?

Avni Ademijs defence lawyer Gzim Kolcak has disclosed details from his defence statement given before the prosecutor in connection with the tragic murder in Pec, where two Kosovo Democratic Party officials -- Astrit Ademiaj and Blerand Kadrijaj -- remained. Kolcak has said that Avni Ademiaj has given the same [...]
Avni Ademijs defence lawyer Gzim Kolcak has disclosed details from his defence statement given before the prosecutor in connection with the tragic murder in Pec, where two Kosovo Democratic Party officials -- Astrit Ademiaj and Blerand Kadrijaj -- remained.
Kolcak has said that Avni Ademiaj has issued the same statement from the very beginning, saying he went out to the scene after hearing noise.
This thing happened before my protection bar. He has the house attached to the bar even when he heard the blast and noise when he arrived at the scene he was injured. That's his statement, and that's how it's been declared from the beginning”, Kolcak said of Telegrafi.
According to the lawyer, Ad Adamaj's health situation is not good, as he is still being treated at the Peja Hospital.
His health situation is not good at the moment, he stressed.
As Kolcak said, the “officials have brought him to trial from the hospital and sent him back from the Court to treatment”.
“He's wounded in the right hand, he's a gunshot wound and exit”, Kolcak said.
Otherwise, the Constitutional Court in Pec-Peja-Chief Department has approved the Constitutional Prosecutor's request in Pec for the appointment of the detention measure against defendants Avni Ademiaj because of allegedly committing murder and illegal weapons.
The court has detailed the performance of the tragic event in Pec, where two officials of the Democratic Party of Kosovo -- Astrit Ademiaj and Blerand Kadrijaj -- remained.
On the date 08.09,2020, about 20:15 in Pec, defendant A.A. deliberately deprives the deceased B of life. K, that way since victim B.K. Along with the witness L.L. had gone to a bar to meet with the victim A.A. where the defendant A” was present, said the communique.
In response, the communiqué says that “during the conversation between the two victims begins to exacerbate the situation and that both victims suddenly pull out their weapons and for a moment while the victims were being fought by defendant A take the gun from victim A and with the same starts shooting at the deceased B, which also at the same time is fired in front of victim A and defendant A, which, as a result of the shots taken from the firearm A's been stolen from the B life, and the victim A has been taken away from the shooting wound taken from the victim of the victim's wound, and the B defendant has also received his left hand.
With these actions, the defendant A.A. had to commit murder by Article 172 of KPRK and criminal work possession, control or unauthorized possession of weapons by Article 366 par.1 of KPR”, it is said in communiqué.
The defendants have been assigned the detention measure in length of 30 days after the court estimated there is doubt that the same committed the criminal acts for which they were suspected.











