Rexhep Selimi's lawyer explodes against French judge: “abuser”, “Speccres”

Selimi's lawyer's parachutes mention the guarantee given by Police Director Samedin Mehmeti for release from his client's custody.

Young strongly accuses the preliminary judge, Nicholas Guillou, of his decision in favour of the Specialised Prosecutor, saying he is speculating and abusing the position of judgment.

The end “S, the SPS stand on guarantees provided by the Kosovo Police Director General, and the finding of the Appeals panel in the same way relates to the proposed conditions at the time of the Interim Releases' decision. As stated in Appeal, the general director's security was given as part of the specific invitation to engage directly with the Police Director if any further clarification or information was required on Selim's proposed additional defence measures. The Pre-Procedure Procedure Judge, rejecting these guarantees based on his speculation about the practice of proposed additional conditions, and not showing willingness to engage with the Director General, decided in such an unfair and unreasonable way that it constitutes an abuse of trial”, Young said in his parliament.

On the other hand, Selimi's defence says it is only the Appeals panel that has found major shortcomings in the reasonings the preliminary judge has given in the decision on detention in January this year.

The parachute reportedly lacks the reasons for refusing detention, which is being submitted each time when there is a request, is undermining the right of defence to appeal the rejected request.

The defense aside even says that by these actions, the French Judge of Pre-Precience Procedure is leaving a dark meaning in the shape of how he or she exercises his powers.

“S first, the answer ignores the fundamental issue of this appeals basis; that the continuing and repeated lack of reasoning undermines the right of defence to appeal the rejected verdict. As was accepted by the SPO in her reply, the Appeals Panel agreed that the January 2021 Pedition Act suffered from a lack of reasoning. The criticism from the Appeals College was not limited to its general findings on “tasked with giving reasonable opinion”, as the answer implies, but in fact referred to certain specific failures on the part of the Pre-emptive Procedure Judge. Opposition to the decision not only does it not cure these defects but repeats them and adds them, ensuring that the ongoing and ongoing jurisdictions continue to develop, leaves a dark understanding of the way the Pre-Servative Procedure Judge exercises his disrepute competencies”, says Selim's lawyer's parachutes.

Protection aside underscores the fact that Appeals has asked the Prosecution Judge and the Prosecutor to make more extensive reasoning on the arguments proposed in the contesting cases.

Otherwise, the Special Court has refused the detention of KLA leaders.

In the decision to former President Thaci, the preliminary judge has even ignored the guarantees of the two states for release from custody.