Prizrenas spat on his wife's face and beat her, for all her banal reasons

The Constitutional Court in Prizren has appointed the 30-day detention measure for the A.H., under suspicion of exercising physical violence against their wife and daughters.

The suspect was arrested on July 20th, the Prizren Foundation Court has announced.

As the court reports, the defendant spits on his wife's face, telling her why you don't answer and then punch her in the head and neck.

Court's full announcement regarding the case

The Constitutional Court in Prizren, the General Department, Procedure Judge Gani Kastrati, has appointed the detention measure during the length of thirty (30) days, which will be calculated from the time of the arrest of 20.07,2021 and may last until 19,08.2021, against defendants A.H., due to suspicion that he committed slight bodily injury by Article 185 par. Three below the front. 3.1. About money. One, and the criminal act of domestic violence by Article 248 pars. 1 connected to par. 2 of the Kosovo Criminal Code.

The court, in case of the detention of defendants A.H., has estimated that legal reasons exist for the appointment of the detention measure, and from evidence collected until this stage, comes a given suspicion:

By July 20th, in the morning hours in Prizren, at his family home deliberately uses the strength to hurt his wife, so that after some premarriage disputes, the defendant spits on his face by saying the words “because you are not answering by the time and in those moments captures the victim violently and knocks him down to the ground, and holding him punching him to the head and neck, and pulling him by the hair, thus causing him to get slight bodily injury

Also defendant A.H., deliberately commits physical and psychological abuse and violence against the injured his daughters so that the same see their father exercising physical violence against his mother, the injured begin to cry, and in those moments the defendant attacks the same ones with facial slaps, with the chance of injury causing fear, psychological stress, anxiety, and uncertainty

Will these facts be argued, however, in the further stages of criminal procedure.

In the case of the detention assignment, the court has taken into account the grave nature, manner and circumstances of committing the criminal acts the defendant allegedly suspected, and the fact that with the defendant's stance on freedom, there is the danger that the same will impede the normal course of this criminal procedure.

From top statements to the procedure judge has estimated that the appointment of detention for the defendant is more than necessary in view of the burden of criminal acts, the behaviour of the defendant, and the insistence that at any cost to finish the work started, demonstrate the risk that with the same defendant released, the same could repeat criminal work, so in the court's opinion the appointment of the detention measure at present is necessary and reasonable.

Note: Against that decision, the dissatisfied side has the right to complaint, at the Court of Appeals, complaints against this act did not delay his execution.