Ignoring two garrisons and continuing Thaci's detention, what did Simmons say about the Special Court?

During yesterday, significant and interesting developments have been reported at the Special Court, linked to former Kosovo President Hashim Thaci and the request for his bail. Thaci's lawyer, Gregory Kehoe, has submitted a request for the former president's release, while also said two powerful states have given [...]
During yesterday, significant and interesting developments have been reported at the Special Court, linked to former Kosovo President Hashim Thaci and the request for his bail. Thaci's lawyer, Gregory Kehoe, has submitted to Special request for the former president's release, while also said two powerful states have awarded guarantees for his parole, but despite that, the Special decided to continue detention of Thaci.
In former President Thaci's lawyer's statements, which yesterday was reported to have seen news.net reportedly two powerful states, one of them contributors to the Special Court, have awarded guarantees for his bail.
The most important “, since the First Decision, protection for Mr. Thaci has now received written guarantees from two states, (“Third States”, one of which is a contributing state, to facilitate Mr. Thaci in their respective territories”, said in Keohe's parade.
But a little later yesterday, that was completely ignored. The Special Court ruled that President Thaci's detention continue with the verdict of the trial judge, Nicholas Guillow.
In his stated decision, Judge Guillou has ordered Thaci's protection that the parachutes concerning the next review of the detention send through August 31st.
Similarly, the lawyer of former President Thaci, Gregory Keohe, has sent his credentials for the former president's detention to the court. In these parliaments, Keohe, in addition to countering evidence presented by the prosecution, also gives details of guarantees offered for release from Thaci's detention.
While these special developments come shortly after the report of former EULEX mission chief judges in Kosovo, Malcolm Simmons, who shocked the opinion with his statements on the mission and the Special Court.
He before Kosovo deputies said he does not trust the Specialised Chambers and that his trust in them is equal to the trust he has in Russia's judiciary or Iran. He added that there are remarks in the international community concerning the Special Court.
I have as much confidence in the Special Court as I would have in a court in Russia or Iran. This is the level of confidence that I have in the Kosovo Spicilised Chambers ... There are serious concerns at the level of the international community regarding the level of jurisdictions of the Court and about how justice is being administered”, Simmons said.
Among other things, Simmons called on the Kosovo government to react after according to him, Special Court “is only there to punish former Kosovo Liberation Army commanders.”.
But similar accusations of Simmons included the EULEX mission in Kosovo. He in his report quoted Judge Charles Smith as saying that he had to condemn the accused in the case of Klecka.
The Eulex member states expect sentences”, Judge Charles Smith quoted Simmons as saying.
Simmons said that the judge in this case had appointed himself as the Court of Appeals. He said he was threatened by the British judge, who, according to him, had demanded that there be sentences in this case.
On four separate occasions, there were claims that Charles Smith tried to intervene in judgments. I can offer you documents on all four occasions. And it wasn't just Judge Smith who wanted to intervene”, Simmons said.
“The excuse was seen as failure”, Simmons stressed.
It remains to be seen what the future developments and actions at the Special Court will be to the former president of Thaci and other former Kosovo Liberation Army leaders who are continuing to be held in custody.











