Hasani: Albin Kurti's proposed peace agreement is primitive

Former Constitutional Court Chairman Enver Hasani described the peace agreement, which Prime Minister Kurti introduced in Brussels during meeting with Serbian President Alexander Vuciq, as primitive.

According to Hasani, this document contains references that, in international law, have emerged from use since 1945.

The first dimension is international law and the second dimension is the political dimension in terms of the role and importance of dialogue for Kosovo at the moment we speak. The political dimension is that anyone who deals with international law and recognizes the terminology of international law, that text takes it as a very primitive text, because it uses the terminology that does not belong to international law at this stage of development that is today, in this century that we live in, and from 1945 to”, it has been expressed.

This is because the last agreement that uses nonattack, no aggression, and the like is the Molotov- Ribbethrop and 539 agreement, and after the year ♫45 use of violence and force has taken another dimension, war is out of the law and therefore no agreement drafted after this period contains no such expressions, but reference that concerns them in international stability, regionally, economic clauses, etc. ”, Hasani said in Rubik.

The former Constitutional Chairman said Kurt's peace proposal has no resolution on relations between states, and as such cannot be taken seriously even by the mediators of dialogue.

The second reason is its provisions are drafted as doing in the mother what we're looking at, as it were, Article 1 Adriatic Kelmendi is sitting here, Article 2 Enver Hasani here. The reference to documents except for two is low water water is a soft right that has no support in relations between countries”.

The third -- which is even more wrong than title itself, human rights and human freedoms -- introduces them into the category of rights that are met with reciprocity, as well as the second world war has been closed because it has been abused, the system of connecting nations has had through reciprocity and has allowed ethnic communities to defend”.

“The system of connecting nations to protection of minorities has been such, now human rights and freedoms are the rights of international law order that does not depend on reciprocity and reciprocity is an idea that has been compromised and is not accepted in any version of the final” agreement.