Court puts two Kline municipality officials under house arrest

According to court, <x0 defendants L.M. and A. G from the 20,09,2019 consecutive until the 09.11,20, object of K. K, acting as co-chairman and defendant L in the quality of director for Urbanism and Environmental Protection, while defendant A in the quality of the official close to the director, taking advantage of office and official authority, exceeds their competencies, aimed at benefiting the other person by acting in opposition to the Law for Construction, without implementing any urban planner, and then releasing construction permits for overbuilding, even though the area map has been granted approval by MHI, but has not yet been read out of a re-initive plan to the municipality and the investor's budgetary advantage through the benefit of land and landfilling. And, with a date of 04.10.20, in the K.K facility, defendants acting as co-chairmen contrary to the Law for Construction, and the Urban Rule Plan 01.nr-351-1830/2016, of the date 25.3.2016, issue construction permits that, the defendants originally issue construction conditions that are allowed to build the apharisto-bane object in two-talls after the same, the investor issuing of construction with which they allow for growth of the Agency at II, and with the benefit of the transparency of the surface and the cause of the building.

With what in their interaction they had to commit criminal acts Abuse of Official Status or Authority That's it. 2 connected to money. 1 linked to Article 31 and 77 of KPRK.

Defendant L. M from 1207,2019 to the date of 22,04,2020, to the KK facility, the quality of the director for Urbanism and Environmental Protection, using his office and official authority, exceeds his competencies, with the goal of benefiting rich benefit for the other person, acting contrary to the Railway Law, in a way that, the defendant in the framework of his official duty without being authorized by 12,07.2019, points out the decision with which he allowed the investor to approach the 20m distance from the railway line after changing the decision from the distance and changing the distance of the railway line to the distance of 17 feet.

With what he had to commit a crime keuse of official position or authority That's it. 2 connected to money. 1 linked to KPRK's Article 77.

The trial of the preliminary procedure, following reviewing the prosecution's proposal for the appointment of the detention measure, found such a request must be denied because the state prosecution has failed to prove the legal basis for determining the detention measure against defendants.

The court has estimated that the house arrest measure at a length of (1) month is sufficient to ensure the presence of defendants in the procedure because criminal acts are committed in co-ordination and at this stage of the procedure are still under way with the aim of identifying new evidence so that with possible finding defendants in freedom the court estimates that the defendants can easily eliminate, alter or hide evidence of criminal work with the intent of avoiding or reducing their criminal responsibility or even co-ordinating their defence with each other since they were well-known and finding indictees in the same manner that they could prevent the normal prosecution of criminal procedure.

The court under official office considered other alternative measures and found that the house arrest measure, as a softer measure, is sufficient for ensuring their presence in procedure and in the function of development without obstacles to criminal procedure and that other softer measures would not be adequate”, the court's announcement said further.

Against this decision the dissatisfied side has the right to complaint at the Court of Appeals.