Serbian generals: Kumanovo Agreement Wasn't capitulation for Serbia

For more than that, some generals, Admirals and professors in Belgrade are continuing to take comfort in saying that the document in question, along with UN Security Council Resolution 1244, defeated Serbia in its fight to keep Kosovo as part of this state.

This surprising “conclusion” was drawn to the conclusion of a conference held in Belgrade, which was titled “Aggression of NATO in the Federation Republic of Yugoslavia and the Cold New War”.

The Belgrade Forum for an Equal World and the Club of Generals and Admirals organised it on the 22nd anniversary of the signing of the Kumanovo Agreement.

The president of this club, General Milomir Miladinovic, has said that after all these years, the truth has not been fully told yet.

As is common in Serbian rhetoric, imaginary figures could not be lacking.

Our army did not yield. Various American sources reportedly during the 1999 bombings, NATO lost 36 planes and 6 helicopters. This data, unfortunately, can rarely be found in the media”, he said.

Even Professor Dusan Prorokovic has said that the Kumanovo Agreement, looked at from the theoretical angle, is the Serbian political subx0ndary “and that thanks to this act “has been enabled to maintain influence in Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina”.

If it wasn't for the Kumanovo Agreement, it wouldn't be Resolution 1244. It is true that NATO won victory over Yugoslavia, but what is that victory?!! Four of its members have not yet recognised the so-called independence of Kosovo”, he has said. Our state reached a lot during the talks, while there was only one argument the West is tired of fighting and that it is not ready for a ground invasion (in Kosovo)”.