Sentenced with 900 euros of nuclear blood that insisted on his kidnapping to receive 5 thousand euros to his mother

The Constitutional Court in Gjakova has sentenced him to 900 euros in fines accused of attempted fraud E.K. He is charged with installing the kidnapping to receive five thousand euros from his mother. Under the trial compiled by Judge Diana Sina, the accused was originally sentenced to 200 euros in fines and 90 days in prison. But [...]
Under the trial compiled by Judge Diana Sina, the accused was originally sentenced to 200 euros in fines and 90 days in prison.
However, with the consent of the accused and his defender, the prison sentence has been replaced by fines of up to 700 euros.
Later, a unique fine sentence has been pronounced against the accused in the amount of 900 euros, reports the “Bet on Justice”.
Otherwise, the accused E.K. had pleaded guilty to the criminal offense he was charged with at the initial session.
Otherwise, according to the act of Basic Prosecution in Gjakova, E.K. It's being charged with being convicted on 30.06.20, around 16:30 in Gjakova, with the intention of illegally benefiting wealth for itself by presenting false facts he's trying to deceive or launder his mother, here the injured Mr. K, to act at the expense of her wealth.
In accordance with the indictment, he has done it in such a way that after the defendant leaves the house, through the phone contact his sister A.K., writing that he was kidnapped by two persons because of a debt worth 5,000 euros, as well as sending him pictures where the defendant is seen lying, with the warning that if this debt is not paid until 3:50, the same will kill it, where it is reported to the police, the police officers have been contacted on the telephone, the same one who declared that it was, so that after the same interview was confirmed by the same interview that no one was kidnapped.
For this, he is accused of committing criminal work “attempted fraud”, by Article 323 paragraph 1 concerning Article 28 of the Penal Code. In paragraph 1 of Article 323, which speaks of “Article 28 describes penalties when someone tries to commit criminal acts but that elements of criminal acts have not been committed. There the sentence is presented as if it had been done, but the judge is given the opportunity to ease his sentence.












