Requesting that the process of selecting Commissioner for Information and Privateness be turned to zero

The Commission for Security and Defence Affairs approved the report with recommendations, and the most voted candidate is Enver Bujar, who has received 69 points, then candidate Crenare Sogojevo Dermaku with 63 points and candidate Edon Miftar with 61.5 points.

The criticism of the candidate selection process for this position has had civil society and opposition, where one of the reasons was the most voted candidate for the commissionary position, in past recruiting processes, was not assessed by passing points and was not recommended for this position by British experts.

The selection of the Commissioner for Information and Privateship, from the start, has been monitored by the Lake Demollie-Niman, director of the FOL organisation, which requires that the selection process be turned to zero and that the selection of the same fail session.

According to her, the deputies of the Vetevendosje Movement, at maximum score, a person who in previous contests was disqualified but who wants to take “cap” this position, which he calls very important.

It's some kind of fraud to call it that against citizens because asking for a vote with the idea that you're going to do the State Cav and start catching in the first 100 days is really not ethical. The disaster remains now that the ruling party has 61 votes, we hope in an MP who believes that democracy can be held in this country and that there can be meritive persons in different positions to reflect and not decide as they may have orders from the party, if they decide on their own. Be assured that this position really has a special significance and we can probably see a degradation of all those good work processes in the opening of data and in publishing various documents that have been done for years with a person who can possibly be detected in the future by the party and we can have a total closure of many documents never to see light”, she says.

One of the reasons why this process should fail, she says it is also because during the analysis of candidates' biographies, they have noted there are changes from the biographies previously handed over by the candidate, who has been assessed at maximum points.

The failure of this process and re-purchasing of the contest is being requested by the deputy The PDK, simultaneously Security and Defence Affairs Commission member Elmi Recica, who says this process should fail in the plenary session and not continue with the “capture of this extremely important position.

It also shows why opposition parties in the Commission had boycotted the candidate interview process.

I request that in the plenary session the process fail and in the future application be applied to those rules and attitudes which have been ongoing and which have been dominant. I have to say that even civil society organizations... as soon as we're overvoted, Mr. Chairman of the Commission. Berisha and I have been against the commission being as an interview panel as a whole. We have withdrawn and remain the deputies of LVV and the Serbian List, who have survived us to lead the process. In this context, I believe it is very clear they have to reflect, those who have urged that through such forms to capture the vital institutions of the state and ... this is a typical tendency to silence the opposition, we as opposition that the three Albanian political parties, even the AKK, the LDK and the PDK, have opposed and opposed and rejected”, he says.

But all charges of opposition and civil society oppose LVV deputy Enver Dugolli, who says the whole process has been transparent and says he is surprised at the demand for the contest to be repeated.

He also denies allegations that LVV is wanting in this position to appoint a person close to them, while stressing that they are the deputies of the Kosovo Parliament that at the plenary session decide for the commissionary selection.

The “first does not stand up, because we were seven commission members in the selection panel and the way voting or rating was completely anonymous and we didn't know who assessed the candidate. To be honest with me, the three of them have been very good and I'm showing this preference that at the start it was all three of them and I've been swimming with the maximum grades of all three of them. So it's not the conclusion of civil society that someone is of Vetevendosje or any other party, because this phase is closed based on the assessment of each member and someone is probably coming out most likely, but it's nothing because the session is what will finally decide for candidate selection for commissioner”, he says.

This is the fourth competition to be held to select the Commissioner for Information and Privateship, as the same has failed three times in a row.