4 hours agoRecognition of the Constitution: There's no law ban on running Lushtak for first Scytheright
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The mayor's candidate for the Skywright municipality, Sami Lushtaku, has no legal obstacle to entering this race, so the connoisseur of constitutional affairs, Progress Gruda. Gruda has said the Constitutional Court Act stresses that “running for any candidate for MP who has been sentenced to a decision [...]
Gruda has said that the Constitutional Court Act emphasises that “the running of any candidate for MP who has been sentenced to a decision on the form cut in the last three years”, while nowhere does the word candidate for mayor or asambliss stress.
There are no legal obstacles to this. He may run for mayor even though he has a judicial decision on his sentence because the Constitutional Court ruling, last year's Constitutional Court act, did not include the mayors, did not include local elections. The conviction device is very clear, says the candidacy of any candidate for MP, who has been sentenced to a decision on form in the last three years. Disposit is very clear uses the word MP”.
If the CEC were to decide to interpret it as even for mayors and asmbists, I think it would be an arbitrator. Under these circumstances I think Lushtaku has no legal obstacle to running, and anyone else. Because we are talking about a concrete case that has emerged but there may be other sentences on certain issues, persons who could potentially be in the race for local elections”, it is expressed.
Connoisseur of constitutional issues has said the Constitutional Court Act is confusing and unclear, which also represents dual standards.
According to Gruda there should be no other standard for gaining the mandate and another for losing it.
The Constitutional Court's bias is extremely confusing and in many unclear parts. In the constitution, we have the standard that the loss of the MP's mandate takes place under circumstances when he is sentenced to effective prison. In the election law you have if you are sentenced to any kind of sentence you cannot run. There can be no situation when there are different standards to lose the MP's mandate and other standard to compete for MP”.
And that's what it's like to run just to have a fined sentence decision, and that could be an obstacle to running. But if you haven't had such a conviction and have managed to become a member of the Parliament-Deputates, then even if you're sentenced to fine you don't lose your mandate because the Constitution says expressly that the mandate is lost only when you're sentenced to judicial decision that envisions prison effect”. It's over, Gruda for EO.
