People's cheating, Hoti sees the 100-day government Kurti.

The country's former prime minister, Avdullah Hoti, has said that the first 100 days of the government's work Kurti was the reflection of popularism and fraud that the Vetevendosje Movement has promoted over the years. We saw what many of us have expected, because when the entire political cause to receive civic support for years with [...]
The country's former prime minister, Avdullah Hoti, has said that the first 100 days of the government's work Kurti was the reflection of popularism and fraud that the Vetevendosje Movement has promoted over the years.
We saw what many of us have expected, because when the entire political cause to receive civic support for years, not only in the last elections, is based on populations that lead nowhere except to create a certain perception, but not based on reality and have no long-term vision, then it's just reflection or reveal of the public fraud that has been done in most of the fields and now when they're in government they're facing them. ”
The former chief executive said Kurti after coming to power changed his stance on the country's main topics, including dialogue with Serbia.
The”Mocked on the main topics, on the topic of dialogue to assume, his attitude has been that we do not start the dialogue without apology, has been that reciprocity will be introduced in the first weeks of his government, and none of these are available. So they built a narrator, but now that they're in the country's government they don't follow that path, they don't fulfill those promises or pledges that they gave to citizens”, Hoti said in Klan Kosova.
According to Hoti, Kurti in Brussels did not discuss the main topic of dialogue, which is mutual recognition.
And despite the differences that we all agree that the dialogue process should be made for mutual recognition, but this (Curt) did not set this up, but came up with ideas for the Norwegian Liechtenstein model agreement with the European Union, that didn't help us, we need full clarity for dialogue, as we have done”











