That's what PAN did: VV votes commissioner who was nominated by British Commission

The people who have voted to send these names were VV members on the commission, Enver Dugolli, Arber Rexaj, Mefail Bajqinovci, Albanian Mehmeti Selimi, Fatmir Humolli and community representative Erdjan Galushi, as most of the points went to Enver Bujar.

Meanwhile, this meeting of the commission has been conveyed with tensions from the opposition and position, which also released the meeting.

The only solution is for the process to return to the starting point. We also have the appreciation of civil society, but we also have the process that was done earlier. A process that will manage all of our data, to start with such arrogance”, Democratic Party deputy Elmi Recica has said, who subsequently issued the Commission's meeting.

Against the commission's election, there were also the Democratic League of Kosovo. LDK commission member Anton Quinn said it makes no sense to stay at the meetings when they have not participated in the applicant commission of candidates.

We have to deal with a matter from the beginning we have separate attitudes. As a result of this, we now have a lack of compliance with who should be declared. Mr. Dugolli must understand that I am not obliged to stay and listen to the report on the subject that I've been declared from the beginning is compromised”, Quinn said.

Meanwhile, Beke Berisha from the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo has said the person whose position has given him the maximum points from the Commission is not right for this position.

You have decided on your own and you have placed the winner for this very important agency. Enver Bujar voted at maximum point, the same person I personally swam with 1 and 2. I wish this man never made choices. I also know this Crennare, and I don't know the other guy. But that's what's coming, Enver Bujar, you vote at 10 and we all know him. And I also have a commitment. You talk to us about going deeper. I wish these people would never choose an institution ranger and let the Agency run anymore. This is about capture the state. I concluded this meeting today. I'm shutting down you continue to collect signatures”, he said.

In the meantime, the repetition of this contest has been requested by civil society.

According to them, there have been irregularities in procedures followed in the fourth process of selecting the Commissioner for Information and Privateness.

The “in the undersigned organisations and activists expresses our deep concern with irregularities and procedures followed in the fourth process of selecting the Commissioner for Information and Private”, the civil society's response reported.

According to them, Kosovo's Defence and Security Commission interviewing panel, consisting of deputies Fatmir Humolli, Albanian Mehmeti Selimi, Mefail Bajqinovci, Arber Rexaj and Enver Dugolli from the Vetevendosje Movement, Srdjan Galushi and the Kosovo Roma Progressive Movement and Slavko Simiić from the Serbian List, have interviewed candidates on June 7th 2021, without the presence of commission members from the opposition.

According to civil society, the process of verifying submitted documentation, interviewing and positionomi have not guaranteed meritary assessment of candidates interviewed.

“For this position, Edon Miftar, Enver Bujar, Crenar Kupiska, Crenare Sogoeva Dermaku, Sadik Kryeziu and Xhemsit Brajshori. Three of them were interviewed, respectively, Edon Miftar, Enver Bujar and Crenare Sogojevo Dermaku. A few minutes before the interview, Sadik Kryeziu withdrew. Present MPs mostly praised candidate Enver Bujar, with 69 points respectively, candidate Crenare Sogojevo Dermaku with 63 points and candidate Edon Miftar with 61.5 points. From direct monitoring of this process, we estimate that the process of verifying the submitted documentation, interviewing and position after the interview has not guaranteed merit assessment of the candidates interviewed, for some reasons”, is said further in response.

Criticism they also had for the candidate who received the most points from the assessment commission. According to the same civil society, it has not delivered the same biographies from what has delivered it in preliminary processes.

The first “, from the biography analysis of all candidates, we have noted that the biography delivered into this process by Mr. Brad is not the same as the biographies he has delivered in previous processes on several points. According to the biography delivered in 2019 in the Kosovo Assembly, Mr. Bujar had stated that he worked as the head of the unit for narcotics investigation in 2006-2019, in the biography handed over in 2020 he had claimed to have worked in that position in the 2009-2020 period, while in the biography handed out in 2021 he has declared working in that position in 2009-2019. Also, the record of biographies is disproportional in study dates. According to the biography handed over the first and second time, he has conducted the Faculty for Political Science and Public Administration at the “College. Fame” for two years (2010-2012) while according to the third-time record, he has performed the faculty for three years in another period of time (2007-2010). He has also changed the dates in which he conducted studies in the field of engineering, including the name of the educational institution. We express our concern that the recruiting panel has not verified this information”, declared by civil society.

<x) The questions were compiled without the presence of monitors from civil society, unlike past processes when we were invited to be part of the whole process. Similarly, MPs have recently made the assessment transparently, announcing the points of appreciation after each interview and offering justification for the assessment made. This time, MPs have anonymously praised candidates by not giving rationale for the points given. We remember that the highest rated candidate from the Commission this time ran even in all past processes, but British experts who had helped the recruiting process in 2019 and 2020 had not assessed it with passing points and recommended it for the position of Commissioner for Information and Private”, said in the civil society response.

The opposition's absence in the interview panel has also been of concern to them.

“We also refocus our concern about the composition of the interview pane. With the Vetevendosje Movement proposal, the panel is made up of all members of the Commission and not only one representative of political parties, such as parliamentary practice so far. While the ruling parties have failed to reach consensus to keep the opposition parties involved, at the same time we consider that the opposition has failed to fulfill its commitment to represent the interests of its voters by participating in the Assembly and by making its contribution”, it is said in response.