8 hours agoMoliqaj for the father of Valdete Daka's successor in the CEC: Tito meal enrichment took place in the invading system
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)Chairman The PSD has said that the new head of the CEC, Kreshnik Radoniqi, has inherited playable and real estate of considerable value from his parent, who according to him are former system officials. In fact, through a Facebook post, he has said that this is exactly why the person in question [...]
In fact, by means of a Facebook post, he has said that this is exactly why the person in question has even become the leader of the CEC, thus paralleling between his case and the case of the consul's appointment of Hadzi Shala's son.
But the difference, according to Moliqaj, is that according to him, Radonic's parents came from a foreign and invading system, while in the case of Haxhi Shala, it concerns a liberation project that was corrupted by neoliberalism.
Molliq's full Facebook mailing:
Nobody picks the parents. From this comes innocence from his exploits, and white paper from his political legacy.
But innocence is not subjectivity. No one is free from family unless he reveals himself to build up with others, another world. The family is a biological reproduction not only but also an ideological material.
None of us started. Being a child of the official is an enormous likelihood of inheriting his active and real estate. You will surely enjoy privileges of schooling and selected employment opportunities.
The heritage of privileges only reminds us that inequality is as historical as it is. It's a phenomenon of injustice that will fight no matter who we talk about.
CEC leader, Mr. Radonick has huge assets inherited from the former system. On this political basis, he also became the Headmaster. From the standpoint of the heritage of privileges, he was not the son of Haxhi Shala. He too had qualifications.
There is a fundamental difference between them: the privileges and the riches come first from a foreign system, conquering and not democratic; The second comes from the project a deliverer, unfortunately corrupted by neoliberalism, slipping into privatisations and tribal benefits. None of these are the solutions or the model. But the difference between them is essential. Whoever reasons that at Tito's meal these jobs were made of paper is a slave to formalism. That meal was an invasion meal. Prime Minister, president, do you hear?
