Moliq for Kurt's 100-days: Anyone who has found our criticism of authoritarianism exaggerated has seen the attack on democracy

He has said the first signs of government are in line with the party and leader's outlook, while saying they have also seen attacks on democracy and independent institutions.

These 100 days don't have to be disciplinary correction when before us we have governments that have no promises or transformation programs. The criticism of efficiency starts after reconciliation with the program, right? Nothing new we expect from those who have moved programming to the centre. Nothing, even if the plan was to live point by point. However, the first signs of governance are in full accordance with the ideological outlook of the Party of Leader. Anyone to whom our criticism of authoritarianism seemed exaggerated has seen the attack on democracy and independent institutions”, Moliqaj wrote in a post in “Facebook”

Moliqaj has also listed some of the government's decisions Box over these 100 days.

It also stopped when it failed to set the reciprocity principle with Serbia.

Two lies were discovered. Lies of failure to fulfill the promise, and of the cause of the collapse of the first government. It was understood that the government did not fall from reciprocity, but from its paranoid with Hashim Thaci's involvement in dialogue;” wrote Moliqaj.

Full Posting:

“100day” of no surprise

The meaning of the first “100 days of governance” has been misappropriated and misconstrued. History begins with American President F. D. Roosevelt. Today, that's the understanding of the “honeymoon”. The first 100 days are laws and major transformational actions for farmers, workers and unemployed people at the time of the Great Depression. President Roosvelt's 100 days opened the way for a major and bold shift. But these 100 days, they don't have to be disciplined when we have governments in front of us that have neither promises nor transformation programs. The criticism of efficiency starts after reconciliation with the program, right? Nothing new we expect from those who have moved programming to the centre. Nothing, even if the plan was to live point by point.

However, the first signs of governance are in full accordance with the ideological outlook of the Party of Leader. Anyone to whom our criticism of authoritarianism seemed exaggerated has seen the attack on democracy and independent institutions.

Two lies were discovered by not deciding reciprocity. Lies of failure to fulfill the promise, and of the cause of the collapse of the first government. It was understood that the government did not fall by reciprocity, but by its prento with Hashim Thaci's involvement in dialogue;

The first few weeks he's been lynching him to the prosecutor;

He has prepared a document concept on the Law on Confiscating Riches that speaks of creating organs outside the justice system that will collect data for citizens. We're ahead of the creation of a <x0) public surveillance agency”. No EU country but Bulgaria does something like that;

He's been downloading the CEC's chief unconstitutionally;

The ministers of this government have offended KLA and veterans attacked;

The dialogue has begun by making concessions that are trying to frame with new terms. The mine without preliminary recognition from Serbia is calling it the Common Regional Market.

By day 101, it seems to mean first year to see it right. Then a warrant. Someone will never be remembered. Most people don't mind, but interest...

And for citizens, it's a political moment. It's a time of resistance to authoritarian power. Hence, they will act, criticize, and resist.