Kadri Veselin defence counters Hague chief prosecutor over detention

Contract Wessel's defense represented by British lawyer Ben Emmerson has listed two conditions that former chairman of PDK is protected in freedom.

In the past case, when the Defence Attorney wrote to the Kosovo Police Director (“Director”), he did not propose a detailed list of conditions. The electronic delivery of May 31, 2021, which the Special Prosecutor's Office estimates as a repeat of a “general willpower for the implementation of legal orders”, 12 was written through a specific approach to a letter from the Lawyer, dated May 26, 2021, in which he unveiled the conditions outlined after the Apel Chamber surveys. 13 In this way, the Director's positive response to a list of proposed conditions, which directly addresses the only true excuse for its continuing ban (more precisely, the danger of secret communication with supporters) is quite clearly changing circumstances. The Judge of Pre-Procedure Procedure will remember that there is not only an assumption of innocence but an assumption of freedom. These two assumptions must be rejected in order to justify the ongoing ban. If the magistrate's short response requires further explanation, the Defense will respectfully show that responsibility now falls to the Pre-emptive Procedure Judge to seek any needed clarification under procedure in Rule 198. If necessary, the director must comment on, whether by statement or negatively, the durability of any proposed constitution”, says in rebuttal”, in response.

The defence conclusion has demanded that Kadri Wessel be temporarily released from custody.

The judge of the preliminary procedure is respectfully required to order Mr. Wessel, with or without the terms proposed,”, is said to retaliate.