5 hours agoIndictees in “case Stanta 2” Today appears before court again
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)Today, the trial against the accused is expected to continue in the case known as “Stanta 2” The last session in this case was scheduled to be held on June 4th, but the same was postponed due to the absence of indictee Murat Abazi, reports “Justice bet”. On prosecution charges in “case Stanta 2”, are on [...]
The last session for this case was scheduled to be held on June 4th, but the same was postponed due to the absence of accused Murat Abazi, reports “The Justice Vow”.
On prosecution charges in case “Stenta 2” are facing 40 defendants, respectively, Gani Bajraktari, Nedimi Zeqiri, Daut Gorani, Elfedin Muharhier, Rezit Emmer, Hamza Selmani, Ismaili Avdimetaj, Sali Shala, Nehat Rexhepaj, Agron Besimi, Petdaj, Bajram Maziufiu, Agron Leka, Drifton Mikari, Gudda, Mirdi Stradin Stradin Shakari, Tekkar, Luka, Lukatarim Papria, Purazini, Purazim Bajram, Ferazim Ferrim Shapriim Shakum Ferali, Exhim Kaldqit Halihqihqim Kalkahqihqi, Edkahqi, Erka Kalkaqi, Erkaqihqihqihqi, Edka Kalkahqihqi, Erkahqi, Erka Kalpatqihqi, Erka Kalkahqi, Erka Kalpatqihqihqihqihqihqihqi, Erkahqihqihqi, Erka Kalka Kalka
In this case, included were former Health Minister (MSH) Ferid Agani, former MSH Secretary Gani Shabani and 11 other indictees, but the case was set aside in three parts in the initial review.
Indictees in “case Stanta 2”, charged by PSRK with criminal acts of abuse of official position or authority and bribery.
According to the SPKR indictment, there is good-based doubt that from January 1st 2011 to December 31, 2015, acting in co-ordination from the position of doctors at the SHSCKUK, they have misused their official positions and authority, in a way that by overcoming their competencies as members of the Cardiology Clinic Consiliar Commissions, knowingly and knowingly have issued reference letters for treatment outside public health institutions of at least 233 people, even though the same had conducted medical treatments.
According to the indictment, this was done to allow people in question to compensate for expenses from the Health Ministry for medical treatment in private institutions, even though, according to the indictment, on the basis of Article 53 of the Law on Health, No,2004/04, February 19, 2014, and Article 16 and 25 of the Health Act No.04/L-125 of December 13, 2012, the reference letters had to be issued to patients at the moment when it found that patients were unable to be treated within the public system.
With these actions of the accused, The SPKR claims the damage caused to Kosovo's budget is 4,555,553.00 euros.
Also, the indictment charges doctors to “case Stanta 2” has been misusing the official position and taking bribes, so that instead of patients who have gone to public health institutions, they refer to the competent invasive unit at the KSKUK Cardiology Clinic in Pristina, patients have referred to them in private hospitals, and for these actions they took bribes.
According to the indictment, each patient they sent for the stents received a bribe of 500 euros, while the choreographer received 150 euros in bribes.
These actions, according to the PSRK, had been carried out in co-operation with the accused who are already involved in the “case. Stanta 3”, which is mainly the owner of private hospital doctors.
The State Prosecutor, on June 15, 2016, had filed charges against former Health Minister Ferid Agani, former State Secretary-General of Mch Ghani Shaban and 62 other people for criminal acts “the mismanagement of official position or authority”, “bribe taking”, “brib>, <6> irresponsponsible medical treatment”, “The illegal anti-law against legal activity and pharmaceutical> <8x> and <x>
Meanwhile, the prosecution had resigned from prosecution against cardiologist Africa Bekteshi, arguing that the same was wrongly involved in the indictment.
In this criminal case, investigations were initially conducted against 116 physical persons and 4 legal persons. However, for 56 physical persons, no legal conditions have been met to be included in this indictment, so the same investigations have ceased.
The defense of the accused has raised numerous dilemmas about the legality of this indictment, which they claim, in addition to containing unacceptable evidence it has been illegally raised by chief state prosecutor Besim Kelmendi. According to the defence, the State Chief Prosecutor's Office has no competencies in establishing the charges, as has happened in this case.
