2 hours agoThe error - laden motivation letter of the commissioner's claim to be supported by the VVA
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The Commission for Security praised Enver Bujar as the potential candidate to elect commissioner at the Agency for Information and Private. British men had previously disqualified Brad, but this did not prevent VVA members from making a maximum estimate of him. Before being voted by the Parliament, Bujar's reaction was also to civil society. His app, [...]
The man who aims at the most important position in Kosovo in protecting personal data and ensuring access to public documents does not know what technocrat or technocratia is.
In his motivating letter, where ambition, experience, and personality are supposed to be written, Bujar chose to say that his work experience has done <x0-techncratically” while talking about technical skills.
It is also clear that the main candidate for commissioner at the Agency for Information and Privateship has not forgotten where exactly it should be placed “ ”.
Brad is currently trying to become commissioner in opposition to law and competition. Civil society has shown that Bujar has not offered the document that testifies to the work experience, as requested by competition. This candidate has only attached the Pension Trust report.
It is known that the Pension Trust report does not testify to the work experience, as required to have at least eight years of professional work experience, five of which should be of leadership position.
The Commissioner for Information and Privateity will be the most important person in Kosovo in protecting personal data and ensuring access to public documents.
We remember VV's deputies paid due points to Enver Bujar, while the Brits never even made it.
<x) The questions were compiled without the presence of monitors from civil society, unlike past processes when we were invited to be part of the whole process. Similarly, MPs have recently made the assessment transparently, announcing the points of appreciation after each interview and offering justification for the assessment made. This time, MPs have anonymously praised candidates by not giving rationale for the points given. We remember that the highest rated candidate from the Commission this time ran even in all past processes, but British experts who had helped the recruiting process in 2019 and 2020 had not assessed it with passing points and recommended it for the position of Commissioner for Information and Private”, said in the civil society response.
