He was not at least booked by the British: VV is accused of choosing non-serious competitive commissioner

Civil Society organisations (OSHC) and activists who have monitored the selection of the Commissioner for Information and Privateship have called on the deputies of the position to repeat the contest because the candidate Enver Bujar, who has received the highest score, was deemed unsuitable.

So stated during yesterday's O The SC, which expressed concern with the Commissioner's selection process.

Observers of the competition for the selection of the Commissioner for Information and Privateness, where candidate Enver Bujar has scored at most, consider that he was deemed unworthy. Opposition parties have boycotted the process, while the assessment has been made only by power deputies.

Civil Society and activist organisations that have monitored the selection of the Commissioner for Information and Privateship, estimate that the scores, which Bujar mostly received, are not meritably divided.

“From direct monitoring of this process, we assess that the process of verifying submitted documentation, interviewing and positioning after interview has not guaranteed merit assessment of the candidates interviewed, for some reasons”, is said in response.

Civil society has found that the claim to be elected Commissioner for Information and Privateness has changed its data several times to the CV.
He, according to observers, has changed his years of study and years of work in the police.

Otherwise, Bujar, who has taken the most of points, has applied for the same position over the past years. However, the British, who have helped the election process, have not given it the passing points.

The Executive Director of the FOL Movement, Meddition Demolli-Niman, has already spoken of the matter.

Demolli-Niman for Periscope has shown the consequences of the Commissioner for Information and Private's non-election.

“As far as the consequences of not being elected by the Commissioner for Information and Privateship have initially been in disfunctioning an Agency for years because it lacks its title. Second as a consequence of not choosing Commissioner, we have two laws that are very important like the Law on Access to Public Documents and the Law on Protection of Personal Data. So the lack of commissioner makes this agency unstable especially in this period when we see every day how personal citizen data is misused or even public documentation denied.”, she said.

But what role does the Information and Private Agency have, and why is this issue sensitive and to be treated with zeal?

The Information and Private Agency (AIP) is an independent agency responsible for overseeing law enforcement no. 06/L-081 for access to Public Documents and Law No. 06/L-082 for the Protection of Personal Data in order to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of the French person, in terms of personal data processing, as well as guaranteeing access to public documents.

The agency acts with full independence in fulfilling the tasks and exercise of competencies, in accordance with this law and responds to the Kosovo Republic Assembly. In fulfillment of its duties and the exercise of its competencies, it acts free from external influence, direct or otherwise, and does not require or receive direction from anyone.

It is not known whether the deputies of the position will cancel the competition after the OSHC response, but what is known if this competition is not cancelled then we will have a non-legal individual head of the Agency for Information and Privates./Periscopi/

Power deputies misappreciated Enver Bujar, who the Britons previously did not even cross