Miftarian: Powerful states that have sponsored the Special Court do not offer competition

Miftaraj, through '%Facebook', has argued that war crimes suspects have been co-operative with justice and, under the Law for Specialised Chambers, should not be kept in custody more than a year.

On the other hand, he has said that developed states which support the Special Court cannot provide guarantees, as it creates prejudice for intervention in the judicial process.

Full Posting:

The third place to give guarantees regarding the accused in Hagge is Kosovo, or said otherwise is the first country in relation to other states.

Powerful states that have been sponsors and promoters of the Special Court are not guaranteed, because they can be considered prejudiced and some kind of intervention in the judicial process, because this court is financed completely by these states, prosecutors and judges come right from these countries. Democratic states attach importance not only to independence in law and procedure, but also to appearance, and to public perception.

All of those accused in Hagge (they don't talk about those who are accused of obstructing justice) have been extremely cooperative, and on the basis of practice, the law on specialized rooms and domestic regulations should not be held more than a year in custody.

In the worst scenario, with or without competition from Kosovo or a third country, the trial is passed on to the prosecution will be protected in freedom. In particular, this measure can change if they do not respect the measures and restrictions that the courts can define.

There is no reason that a fair trial process promoting the rights and freedoms of the defendants keeps the accused in custody for five years as long as it is expected to extend the trial process to the first degree.