6 hours agoAmerican expert: To determine the origin of COVID-19 so it doesn't come to COVID-32
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The investigation into the origin of the coronary is “obsolutely critical” if we want to prevent further pandemics and avoid COVID-32), US expert Peter Hotez said. We'll have COVID-26 and COVID-32 if we don't fully understand the origin of COVID-19. This is absolutely critical “, said Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at the College [...]
We'll have COVID-26 and COVID-32 if we don't fully understand the origin of COVID-19. This is absolutely critical “, said Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor Medical College in Houston.
Hotez said about NBC that he believes that the United States should do much more than begin investigations into theories that the virus was transmitted by animals, or that it <x0... York Post”
I think we've done as much as we can in the field of intelligence. The United States must send experts to the pandemic's epidemi center in Wuhan. We need a team of scientists, genetics, biologists, experts for the naked, to spend six to 12 months in the Chinese province of Hubei, in order to fully discover the source of COVID-19 “, Hotez stressed.
He added that it was “aware that China would not agree to full co-operation”.
We have to pressure China, even possible sanctions, to allow a team of epidemiologists and high virologists to have unhindered access to animals, people and samples from the laboratory,” added Hotez.
A State Department fact sheet claimed without evidence that some researchers at the Wwan Institute of Virology had been sick with symptoms similar to those of COVID-19 or ordinary seasonal diseases before the first case publicly confirmed in December 2019, Reuters writes.
A May 5th story, by Nicholas Wade in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, said that lab scientists experimenting on a virus sometimes introduce a sequence called “place of blasting the fury” into its genome in a way that makes the virus more infectious.
David Baltimore, a Nobel Prize-winning virologist quoted in the article, said when he discovered the sequence in SARS-CoV-2 genome, that he felt he had found <x0m of tobacco smoke” on the origin of the virus.
Many scientists believe that one origin by nature is more likely and have seen no scientific evidence to support the laboratory's leak theory.
Christian G. Andersen, a scientist at the Scrips Research who has done a great deal of work in Corleone, Ebola and other pathogens transmitted from animals to humans, said similar genomic sequences occur naturally in the coronary and are unlikely to be manipulated in the way David Baltimore describes for experiments.
Scientists who favour the hypothesis of natural origin have relied mainly on history. Some of the most deadly new diseases of the past century have been found in human interactions with wildlife and domestic animals, including the first SARS epidemic (night shit), M ERS-CoV (deve), Ebola (nakure or non-human primats) and Nipah virus (nak).
While a source of animals has not been identified so far, stalls in the wild world market in Wuhan after the explosion resulted in positive, suggesting an animal or human manager.
Science Letter on March 4 to O BSH focused attention on the laboratory leak scenario, but offered no new evidence. Nor has the final test of a natural origin been shown.
US President Joe Biden said on May 26th that his national security staff does not believe there is enough information to assess a theory more likely than the other. He instructed intelligence officials to collect and analyse information that could be closed to the final conclusion and report again after 90 days.
