Four witnesses are expected to be heard today in case Gani Geci is charged with murder

Sokol Musliu, Idriz Morina, Afrim Nuraj and Naim Miftari have been called to give their testimony during Thursday's hearing at the Constitutional Court in Mitrovica, reports “Justice Vowrim”.

Otherwise, at the first retrial session held on 30 March of this year, prosecutor Naim Beka has resigned from prosecution for the weapons use work.

According to prosecutor Beka, the above-mentioned work has been consumed by the crime of murder, for which it gives up its third point of indictment.

Thereafter, at that session, Gec Gec has stated that for the second point of the indictment, which charges it with criminal work of ownership, control, or unauthorized possession of weapons, he admits guilt. As for the first point of the indictment, which charges him with the criminal murder, Geci said he does not feel guilty.

“pleaded guilty for carrying and possession of the weapon. I kept my gun for self-defense, because I had several assassinations. While for the criminal offense I do not feel guilty”, the defendant Geci has declared at the 30 March session.

However, the plea of guilt has been rejected by the court, led by Judge Radoslav Markovovic, since according to him, admission of guilt is considered when given at all points given as in the indictment.

Otherwise, the Constitutional Court in Mitrovica, on 3 June 2016, had sentenced Gani Gecin to 4 years and 6 months in prison for the murder of Ruzhdzi Shaqiri, reports “Justice Trust”.

He is accused of committing it in the <x0-> capefact NQosh”, in the center of Scytheright, on August 4, 2014.

Geci had admitted to committing this murder, saying that he had committed it in self - defense after claiming that he was in danger of being killed.

Following the first - degree ruling, the Court of Appeals had considered the complaints of the parties, on September 26, 2017, and the case had turned into retrial.

In the act of Appeals, provided by “Justice Vow fight”, it was said that the first degree court has not approved the mention of criminal acts under the amended indictment in “the serious assassination”, since it was not clear which criminal act it has declared guilty.

According to the ruling, by the legal appointment of the criminal act according to the device of the indictment, it turns out that the accused has been found guilty of the criminal offence of “murder”, while by describing incriminating actions, respectively, facts and circumstances that constitute the criminal work figure turns out that the accused has acted in a state of severe mental shock, countering those that, according to the second degree, make the law device unintellable.

These contradictions and vagueities are so pronounced in the judgment that they make it unclear, confused and judicially unstable and that they present essential violations of the penal procedure provisions, which provide grounds for annulment of the court, because they are of absolute nature and cannot be averted in this procedure, because they make it impossible to assess the legality of the bias in words”, it was said in the Act of Appeal.

Meanwhile, with this decision, the complaints of the injured Halime Shaqiri and its authorised representative, lawyer Sokol Dobgurina, Apel, had been named as non-launch./