an hour agoSocial Democrats respond to Kurt: Where is Reciprocity now that it's LDK to crash you?
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The Social Democratic Party has issued a response to Facebook following Kurt's warned visit to Brussels, despite not yet deciding the move of Reciprocity to the Republic of Serbia. Kosovo Social Democrats have accused Kurti and his government of “of lying”. They cite the great power the VV received in the last elections, and [...]
Kosovo Social Democrats have accused Kurti and his government of “of lying”.
They cite the great power the VV received in the last elections, which leaves no room for any obstacle “to the functioning of decision-making”, Perskopi explains.
“The LDK is not there to knock it down, and strangely again there is reciprocity. Yesterday we were told that it's not only about Serbia, we have problems with other countries. From reciprocity to CEFTA.” says this reaction.
The PSD has stated that with non-principlement of the question of dialogue, Kurti is actually asking for “not to be asked to account for” if he makes painful compromises for the country's fate.
Full response:
There's reciprocity, dialogue, yes, and lies...
Today, a month passed from the formation of Kurti Government. The long-term electoral vow expired. Recyprocytes scoffa, dialogue yes, even lies. Lies weeks and months. For many, unfortunately, lies will last because they won't be seen.
The government has no obstacle to operating or decision making. The LDK is not there to knock it down, and strangely again there is reciprocity. Yesterday we were told that it's not only about Serbia, we have problems with other countries. From reciprocity to CEFTA. Fortunately, S therefrom said Serbia has changed now, as it has said about the Serbian List.
Reciprocity is a matter of weeks he said, but it seems like a matter of weeks are meetings with Vucinqiqi. An outright dialogue, not a principle, and an association. This is the way it went “History”. Within this framework, we need to understand weak maneuvers with prioritization or not dialogue. When he says dialogue is not a priority, he is, in fact, seeking a shift of attention and a reduction of the importance that this subject has on citizens and public opinion. In fact, he is asking us not to answer him. You are seeking dialogue without supervision, without transparency.
We all need to be alert and alert because the minimum association Lajcak requires is a version brought down by the Constitutional Court. Kosovo needs dialogue, but the way the process has taken is not that of final agreement on mutual recognition. No one, nor opposition, nor civil society should become facilitators of this process.
