“Password Confiscatation Act guarantee for results, failure rationalization=x1>

The bill on confiscating unwarranted property, if it is transformed into law, following the eventual adoption of the Kosovo Assembly, provides no guarantee that concrete results will be made. Ehat Miftaraj from the Kosovo Democratic Institute (IKD) has said that with the same justice system, this bill does not bring changes. “A justice system, [...]
The bill on confiscating unwarranted property, if it is transformed into law, following the eventual adoption of the Kosovo Assembly, provides no guarantee that concrete results will be made.
Ehat Miftaraj from the Kosovo Democratic Institute (IKD) has said that with the same justice system, this bill does not bring changes.
“A justice system, the same judges and prosecutors who have a very advanced legal framework for sequencing and confiscating property, and if for 20 years there is almost no result that if it gives another civilian opportunity to prove their property is not guarantee that there will be concrete results. With the same methods of looking for a different outcome and almost here the same approach is implemented”, it is expressed.
Even according to Miftal, politics and justice systems, their failures reason on the need for increased laws, provisions, and laws.
It's best to change three articles, but I'm still going back to what we're saying with the Law on Confiscatation. In 2019 there was the State Prosecutor who wanted these in if they were being changed today. So it was a prosecution request because they said we can't fight war crimes because we don't have proper legal grounds. This shows that the policy and system of justice their failures try to reason that we need a new article, provision, or law”. “Until the mentality of the justice system changes, prosecutors and judges do not consider it an obligation to respect the constitution first, to observe the obligations the Constitution defines and the law is not that we can expect better days. That's why I believe that the Vetevendosje Movement, the ruling party, all its forces and power, should lead it to self-preservation. Only vetoing can be the hope of clearing the system of criminal elements, politics, interest groups so that we can then have judges and prosecutors who are simply able to fulfil their” mandate, has ended for EO.
The introduction of the Law for Confiscating Unjustified Riches is being described as a good step by the analyst, Arton Mujarrier.
Muharnier has said that if implementation of this law is initiated by the co-partisans of Prime Minister Kurti and Justice Minister Haxhiu, then there are signals that his treatment by this government has been taken seriously.
I think this fine law that has been voted, well, it's going to happen, if that's going to happen, but I'd like to see Mr. Kurti and the justice minister implement this law in favour of the partners because there are partners who have created illegal wealth, they have created riches that are unknown to the source. It is this law that should be initiated by those who do not comply with income reports and investment expenses. If the law is initiated by those in the party, I consider it possible to be said that they are serious about dealing with this 34x1> law, it is expressed.
“Whether this law was done to avenge political opponents I think this is a game that Mr. Kurti makes to intimidate the opposition and other parties not to oppose on specific topics”, he added.
Opposition MP from the Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), Bekim Haxhiu has said the Law on Confiscating Unjustified Riches is the legal initiative that must be continued. There is no legal initiative in the country so far, there is an approved concept of document in Government, when you come to the Parliament we have made the contribution. I hope the government will not back down from this initiative but continue the procedures it meets under the Constitution and by law”.
We don't have any documents in the Assembly regarding the law on the seizure of unwarranted property, I encourage Government to proceed with that concept-document that it has made public”.











