2 hours agoSix years and six months in prison for two men who violated the mentally flawed victim
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The Constitutional Court in Pec has declared a conviction case against the H.M. and US defendants, who have forced the initial victim B. The U.S., to commit sexual acts without her consent and her using her limited mental ability. According to the court, defendant H. M, from the date 05.02,2020 wide on the date 07,02,2020, [...]
The Constitutional Court in Pec has declared a conviction case against the H.M. and US defendants, who have forced the initial victim B. The U.S., to commit sexual acts without her consent and her using her limited mental ability.
According to the court, defendant H. M, from the date 05.02,2020 wide on the date 07,02,20 in his apartment, has forced the victim B. The US, to perform the sexual act, without her consent and her using her limited mental ability, in that way that after the victim had gone to his apartment with the suggestion of the S.A.P.P. and given her limited mental abilities, committed sexual acts with her at the same time as she had stayed in his apartment, where the victim after leaving to buy bread by the date 07.022020, meets with her brothers near H.M.'s residence and reported in the police station.
With these actions, the defendant has committed a criminal offense.
The defendant S.G. from May 2019, dated 07.02.20, forced the victim B. The US to perform sexual acts without her consent and her using her limited mental ability, in that way that after having met the victim before they had contacted and knowing her mental capacity, the defendant engaged in sexual relations with her so that every time he went out with her he committed sexual act without her consent and her pledge of marriage, then with his suggestion the victim had gone to H defendant's apartment. M, where the same had committed sexual acts. The defendant's actions have committed a criminal offense, by Article 227, par.4 points 4.7 of KPRK. The H.M. defendants were sentenced to prison in the course of six years and six months, in which the sentence is counted the time spent in house custody and arrest. The defendants S.G., the court pronounced the prison sentence in length of six years and six months, in which the sentence is calculated even the time spent in house custody and arrest. The H.M. and US defendants were appointed detention measures, which will last until the full might of the indictment but, no longer than the stated sentence. The defendants individually were charged with paying the amount of money in the name of criminal procedure, the court's payment of a hundred and twenty-four euros, on behalf of the expenses of the judicial pause amounting to fifty (50) euros, and on behalf of the penalty for the crime victims of 50 (50) - all in the 15-day term - after the act becomes dominant. For the implementation of the property requirement, damaged has been directed to regular civil disputes”, the announcement said.
Against this act the disgruntled side has the right to complaint at the Court of Appeals.
