Kurti delivers comments to Constitutional following Serbian List complaint

Prime Minister Albin Kurti has today sent it to Constitutional Court Chairman Arta Rama-Hirizi, a letter of response to the 11 Serb List deputies who complained about him because he was allowed to lead only one ministry. Kosovo's government considers it should refer to constitutional provisions which define the procedure for [...]
Prime Minister Albin Kurti has today sent it to Constitutional Court Chairman Arta Rama-Hirizi, a letter of response to the 11 Serb List deputies who complained about him because he was allowed to lead only one ministry.
The Kosovo government considers it should refer to the constitutional provisions which define the procedure for electing the government, and to those who guarantee minority rights for representation in its context, in order to assess whether the controversial decision is drawn under the pre-represented procedure in the constitution, and whether the same is for the content in line with the constitution.
Similarly, the government re-exemplifies that representatives of the Serb minority in the Kosovo Assembly have been consulted, and their proposal has been taken into account regarding the appointment of the minister representing the Serb community in the Government of Kosovo.
In this case, the Government of Kosovo in its arguments considers that representation guaranteed by the Constitution of Kosovo for representatives of the Serb minority has been respected for the government's election case, subsequently, its election is in line with the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo.
In her letter, the Government of Kosovo seeks from the Constitutional Court to issue justice by which I declare the request acceptable, to find that the decision of the Republic of Kosovo's decision on electing the government is in accordance with the Constitution of Kosovo, and to reject the requirement for setting temporary measures.
In the end, the Kosovo government considers that this issue has no qualms, so the requirement for holding the hearing is not justified and that the same should be rejected.










