Gorani: Kosovo has two options, or association or discussion on territorial exchange

Opinionist Dukagjin Gorani has commented on the performance of the Kosovo dialogue, Serbia.

Gorani on Rubik's show in Klan Kosova has criticised Kosovo governments over its approach to this process.

He said they repeatedly said “We don't cry until we go into dialogue that we're being told by the foreigners”.

But Gorani stressed there has been no need for other mechanisms as reasons to block dialogue.

“Dialogue has been an international issue. But you don't have much choice before international immigration. Either accept it or reject it in the face of isolation. If you accept it by installing it, you also have to admit it because Kosovo is not a country that can be postponed with the international community, especially not with that part which effectively wants the good”.

Then the dialogue was supposed to be active. Not as if past governments have said “We're crying without going into dialogue because we're being pushed by foreigners” But we're going to dialogue and we're interested in finishing those unresolved issues if there are any more Serbia and we're interested in good neighborhood”.

I've always been surprised to come out with the side mechanisms to avoid the answer on a very simple question. If you don't get into dialogue, don't go. You don't have to tax. You don't need creative solutions to block the process. If you want to block the process, don't go and you'll be isolated”

The former Kosovo Parliament delegation added that the negotiation process between Kosovo and Serbia should end with a compromise.

Dukagjin Gorani, said Kosovo must either accept the Association of Serbian municipalities, or there will be discussions on any exchange of territories.

This is a negotiation. These negotiations must end with a compromise. That compromise is now offered on two plains. And now the hand in the heart of one of them is also the international obligation”.

“O will accept the Association of Serbian municipalities, or be included in geopolitical discussions in the region that include any exchange of territories or border rewrites. None of the parties involved in this negotiation process have provided any other creative solution, but have been introduced into the installations proposed by the international community”.