He beat the woman badly for television: A month of detention without TV for prisrenas

According to the report, the suspect has punched his wife in various body parts, causing minor bodily injuries.

The event occurred yesterday in Prizren.

“-The defendant A.Q., on April 15th, in the afternoon, in Prizren, due to preliminary disputes with the injured wife, about a television, the suspect attacks his wife by punching her with fists at different parts of the body, causing severe bodily injury with temporary health consequences to”, the statement said.

Can't believe the defendant will be able to watch television in custody. /Periscope

Full announcement:

Prizren, 16 April 2021 ♫ The Constitutional Court in Prizren, the General Department, procedure judge Fidan Hoxha, has appointed the detention measure of thirty-30 days, which will be counted from the time of the arrest of 15,04.2021 and may last to 15,05.2021, against defendants A.Q., due to suspicion of having committed criminal work: heavy bodily injury by Article 186 par.1 points of the Kosovo Criminal Code 1.3.

The court, in case of the detention of defendants A.Q., has estimated that there are legal reasons for the appointment of the detention measure, and from evidence collected until this stage, comes the suspicion that:

The defendant A.Q., on April 15th, in the afternoon in Prizren, due to preliminary disagreements with his wife, about a television TV, the suspect attacks his wife by punching her in different parts of the body, causing severe bodily injuries with temporary health consequences

Will these facts be argued, however, in the further stages of criminal procedure.

The procedure judge has estimated that legal conditions have been met for appointing the detention measure to indictees A.Q., given the fact that investigations are in the initial phase, the Court has also taken into account the statements of the injured under which the defendant has already exercised violence and mistreated him.

Thus, from the Supreme Court has come to the conclusion that in concrete cases the detention assignment is legitimate and necessary, since in concrete cases we are dealing with the criminal offense of serious bodily injury where the victim is the sensitive person and the defendant is in family relations with which criminal action threatens or damages human integrity as one of the basic and fundamental rights, in the court's opinion the appointment of the detention measure for the time being necessary and reasonable.

Note: Against that decision, the dissatisfied side has the right to complaint, at the Court of Appeals, complaints against this act did not delay his execution.