Veton Berisha reacts after the Supreme decision: Unacceptable, Double Standards

According to him, this decision has double standards, is unilateral and unclear.

COMMUNICS

March 12, 2021

The Supreme Court's decision is unaccepted for the Egyptian Liberal Party, PLE

After analyzing PZAP's decision. No.736 /2021 and the Act of Supreme Court A. No.29/2021, the Egyptian Liberal Party ʹPLE estimates that these decisions are not accepted for the principle that they contain double standards, are biased and unclear in the real and conservative respect.

In PZAP's reasoning and the conviction confirmed by the Supreme Court points out that the panel of dates 06 and 07 March 2021, under official duty, has conducted investigations to prove the actual state of concrete case and came to the conclusion that appeals are partly based on the reason that the evidence on the subject records, respectively, by the panel's investigation based on the evidence attached to the subject has proved that the number of votes won by political subject <x0man Romano<1> does not coincide with the number of voters for which it has competed as the pre-election representative for Kosovo's decision, held on February 14th, the Commission.

Strangely, though, in the same act, the Supreme Court rejects “Romania's complaint, Initiative” appears to have confirmed that there has been orchestrating of the vote, while in the same act of prejudice to us as political subject. PLE rejects our claims in complaints, confirming there was no ballot orchestrating in Gracanica municipalities, North Mitrovica and Kamenica!

Now the question is whether there was a ballot orchestration or not! ?

Political Subject PLE estimates that if in one case, the object of the subject is the same and the claims are different, then one of these parties involved would have to be approved and the other rejected, whereas the Supreme Court had rejected both sides in question!

So we're going to present to the municipalities that have been the subject of review at the Supreme Court and very clearly is reflected in the disproportionship between the number of residents in those municipalities and the number of votes won, which the standard has not been implemented uniquely by including these municipalities as follows:

• In Gracanica, where “Romania Initiative” has won 1773 votes, meanwhile, the number of Roma population is 745;

• In Kamenica, where “Romania Initiative” has won 283 votes, meanwhile, the number of Roma population is 240;

• In northern Mitrovica, where “Romania Initiative” has won 198 votes, meanwhile, the number of Roma population is 40 overall. Statistical data is based on 2011 population census as well as O report The OSCE of 2018 (included are data to all residents, including unjustly voting).

So based on the above-mentioned data, we estimate that the Supreme Court has not used a unique standard in the sense that with the same evidence and arguments it approves as based on claims by canceling votes in several municipalities, while in some other municipalities, it rejects complaints and thus the court has created inequality before the law.

Political Subject PLE, however, does not accept this election result on February 14th, due to already publicly known reasons and to protect the constitutional and legal right of Egyptian community voters in Kosovo, we will proceed to the Constitutional Court in order to confirm our right.