Key: I'm the only one, most of the Steering Council want the dismissal of Headship.

PDK Steering Council member Lirak Celij has said that this party needs a change in the concept of decision-making where the party's organs are respected, as according to him, this party is currently usurped by certain individuals.

Celaj said the PDK is left without cause and should be further focused on what they are engaged in.

“The PDK is left without cause and has lost it, had a cause of it, and I think that we should be guided to stand by what they engage in. The PDK, what are its intentions on the national plain and others. Now how it's ruling The PDK is usurped by several individuals, and those except for engaging in their positions do not commit to anything greater on issues of national interest, and much less for the party”, Celaaj told Online Economy.

He has said in the PDK there should be a change of governance in parties where party bodies are respected and decisions are not made by certain individuals.

The concept of governance needs to be changed because so far only individuals have made decisions and other bodies have been partially ignored or treated, the Headship, the Steering Council, and the branch level. So change the decision-making concept where we are all participants in making big decisions”, he said.

Celaj says he is not the only one seeking party changes and responsibility for the PDK's fall on three sides of the last elections.

According to him, there are many members of the Steering Council and part of the current headship that supports it for the dismissal of the PDK chairmanship.

The most responsible said that most members of the Steering Council and part of the headship I've contacted are in favour of this idea. For the PDK's decline in the last three elections, someone has to take responsibility. Many of these figures that are now in leadership have even then been in leadership and have responsibilities. Someone has to take moral responsibility before the electorate and before the opinion”, he said.

Despite disagreements over the way the party is being led, he agrees with the party's stance on voting against Vjosa Osmani for president.

According to him, Osmani, although receiving large numbers of votes, is not a unifying figure for the country's first.

“Vyosa Osmani has been very divisive and conflicting, but above all since Vetevendosje and part of it was also Vjosa Osmani has won the majority, I think it wouldn't be healthy for democracy to have a political subject of all the” institutions, Chellaj said.

At the recent meeting of the Steering Council, Lirak Celaj had proposed a no-confidence motion by the Steering Council, but who had subsequently withdrawn it since, as was the dissatisfaction like this point, I tried to get into the agenda.