Former Constitutional Chairman: Decision PZAPA for cancelling communities' votes was fair

According to him, this decision of PZAP is fair and based on Constitution and Law.

I think the decision is fair professionally and I think it has to be proven because the decision in the first order is based on the Constitution, on the protection of the constitutional guarantees of the majority communities because it is also based on the Deut”, he has stated in Calxon Pernimes.

Hasan said that if these votes were not cancelled, there would be implications in the upcoming elections.

If that logic were to be tolerated, I believe there would be implications for Kosovo's constitutional order in the upcoming elections and had influenced national homogenism, in which they can produce undesirable consequences for all communities and, above all, for order and stability in Kosovo”, he added.

Likewise, Hasani stated that if the Bosniak community's candidate for deputy, Adrijana Hodzic, issues complaints to the Supreme Court, there are not enough arguments.

“Those who are the disgruntled party have no argument but what they say is the vote is free, but the guaranteed vote is manageable because it is the general vote, but if that's how you want to break that guarantee, and they are cross-check arguments”, Hasani said.

Different, during today's P. ZAP made the decision to cancel the 40,000 205 votes of the Adrijana Hodzic initiative in 10 Serb majority municipalities in Kosovo, where votes for the V coalition have been cancelled. AKAT, Nasha Initiative DSA.