O BSH refuses to issue first results on COVID-19 origin

The World Health Organisation (OBSH) has given up plans to release the first results of an investigation into the origin of coronary in China and announced a full report for the second half of March. Instead of a preliminary report, the full report will be presented in the week after 14 March, said [...]
The World Health Organisation (OBSH) has given up plans to release the first results of an investigation into the origin of coronary in China and announced a full report for the second half of March.
Instead of a preliminary report, the full report will be presented in the week after 14 March, team leader Peter Ben Embarek said today in Geneva.
Embarek led a group of scientists selected by the World Health Organization (OBSH) to visit hospitals and research institutes in Wuhan in central China, where the new choreography was first identified to discover its origin.
O The BSH gave no reasons Friday for changing its plan to publish the results.
O Experts' Mission The U.S. in China was conducted after months of negotiations with Chinese authorities, who sought to prevent it from being blamed for the pandemic.
The results presented at the first press conference after the trip to China were unclear. Embarek appears to have ruled out the possibility that the virus “flows from a lab in Wuhan, claiming that the virus was transmitted to people from bats through some middleman, as previously assumed.
The mission was under criticism of critics and O BSH was bombed on charges that it relied heavily on Chinese data and on politically compromised field work.
Team members themselves said China is reluctant to share key data that may suggest the disease is spreading for months before it is known.
A group of 26 scientists published an open letter stating that O's mission The BSH “did not have the mandate, independence or entry needed to conduct a complete, unhindered” investigation into COVID-19 theories of origin.
“All assumptions are still on the table and I have yet to see at least one independent scientific evidence that would exclude some of them”, said Nikolay Petrovsky, a vaccine expert at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia.












