Attorney of the family killed in Decan: The prosecutor has testified that he is partial

Agonys Tetaj's father published a heavy-looking video of the incident that took place in Decani two years ago where he sees how accused Shaban Gogaj had fired a gun and left his son dead, who was working at the glove company. Publishing [...]
The publication of this video has been made in response after the prosecutor of the case in the final address Tuesday has requalified criminal activity from “the assassination of “to “Murder by Carey”.
The Serbian family lawyer Berat Tmava, in Klan Kosova, has said the father of the deceased has felt insulted that the requalification of the criminal act has been made, at the same time, why, according to him, the evidence is not in favour of such an act.
This was a response to the deceased's family, either the father of the deceased. He has felt strongly offended by the State Attorney when he qualifies criminal acts in that way in view of the evidence that is found in the subject files. No evidence existed for criminal acts to qualify in that way. The stubborn truth is as described in the device of the Constitutional Prosecution Act. The Founding Attorneyate in Pec has confirmed this, which has even filed the indictment. We consider that even the change of the prosecutor has been done without any reasoning”.
The video is a fact that even if we want to change it, we can't. They're life-long evidence following us. The actions of accused Shaban Gogaj have best explained in their report to ballistic experts, detailing in detail the golden rules of using the weapon the accused had known about. The two experts have come to the fore and the professional conclusion that the defendant has had preliminary knowledge of the use of the firearms. The forensics specialist, who has been heard twice in the court examinations, has remained completely close to these opinions and has not changed a single letter”.
He has said that by means of a parachute he has asked the head of the court to retrial this case and the prosecutor of the case to change by saying that the latter has testified that he is partial.
“How dare a prosecutor who has neither filed the indictment nor carried out the investigation, and has come in without any reasoning, and in the final word puts us before the act committed and makes requalification of criminal acts contrary to legal provisions and Article 350 of the Kosovo Penal Code<1>.
“I don't know why, but we've insurgently released the courtroom and we've seen something wrong. We won't even participate in declaring the sentence if it's announced. I've written a pretence to the head of the court where I've asked that this criminal case be retriald once again and that the prosecutor of the case will be changed from this case because he has testified that he is partial. The prosecutor of the case, I say full responsibility, has played the lawyer, not the prosecutor's, as provided with legal provisions”.
I've accepted a copy of the prosecutor's final word, which gives no special attention to expertise that reflects everything, not even videoisation, but is impressed by statements from Goga's workers who are subjective to receiving pay in the area that they say had happened the accident. These witnesses were subjectives that neither the prosecutor nor anyone else has the right to give them their faith”.











