Visit to the home of Haxhi Shala, Constitution suspends review of VV '%s' complaint to Thaci

The Constitutional Court has decided to halt the procedure of reviewing Pacolli's bid and 29 other deputies of the Republic of Kosovo's Parliament for assessing the constitutionalisation of “President of the Republic of Kosovo on 3 June 2020 at the private home/house of the deputy Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo“. In the decision [...]
In the Constitutional Constitutional Court's decision, the reviewer has proposed that in accordance with Article 113 of the Constitution, with Article 44 and 45 of the Law for the Constitutional Court, and with the rules of 59 and 75.5 of the work regulation, the procedure to review the application of the forgers is halted.
Constitutional Court ruling:
Foreground: Pacolli win, 29 other Kosovo Republic Parliament deputies
The issue of application was the assessment of the constitutionality of “President of the Republic of Kosovo visit 3 June 2020 to the private home/house of the Kosovo Republic MP“. In their request, the forgers claimed that using unconstitutional mechanisms, the president has committed serious violations of the Constitution, in particular of Article 83 [The President's Status], of Article 84 [the President's Comissions], paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 14, and Article 4 [The Foundation of Governance and Power Divisions] concerning Article 7 [Vlerat], Article 65 [Kumpence], paragraph 8, and Article 16th of the Constitution of the Republic. The accusers also demanded that the Court hold a public hearing regarding the case.
The request was based on paragraph 6 of Article 113 [Juridication and Authorised Pals], of the Constitution, at Article 22 [Request Processing], 44 [exacting] and 45 [Aphats] of Law No. 03 L-21 for Constitutional Court, and rule 32 [Preparation of requests and responses] and 75 [requirements in accordance with Article 113.6 of the Constitution and Article 44 and 45 of the Law] of the Constitutional Court's work regulator.
The review college proposed that, in accordance with paragraph 6 of Article 113 of the Constitution, with Article 44 and 45 of the Constitutional Court Law, and with the rules of 59 and 75.5 of the work regulation, the procedure for examination of the demand of the for advers.












