3 hours agoCase “Subventions”, 9 officials are assigned detention by 1 month, two others placed under house arrest
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The Constitutional Court in Pristina has approved the Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor's request for the appointment of the detention action against defendants S. S., L.S., H.M., B.N. K.Z., A.U., D.A., P.C., S.C., and K. Bʹ S. for criminal acts taking bribes from Article 421, paragraph 1, taking bribes from Article 422, paragraph 1 and using [...]
The Constitutional Court in Pristina has approved the Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor's request for the appointment of the detention action against defendants S. S., L.S., H.M., B.N. K.Z., A.U., D.A., P.C., S.C., and K. Bʹ S. For criminal acts taking bribes from Article 421, paragraph 1, taking bribes from Article 422, paragraph 1 and Misusing official position or authority, from Article 414, paragraph 2 of the Republic of Kosovo Criminal Code and defendants S.S. Suspected because of the criminal offence to hire leaders after conducting criminal acts by Article 380, paragraph 1 concerning paragraph 2.7 of the Republic of Kosovo Penal Code.
Defendants S. S. L.S., S.S., H.M., B.N., C.Z., A.U., D.A., P.C., the court has assigned the detention measure to a length of 1 (one) month apart, while against indictees S.K. and K. BʹS. The request for the detention measure was rejected and the house arrest measure was set, at a length of (1) months each separately, since the same has concluded that the initial conditions with Article 187, paragraph 1, below paragraph 1.1 and 1.2, points 1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 1.2.3 of the Republic of Kosovo's Penal Code have been met.
The prosecutor of the preliminary procedure has estimated that these security measures are adequate for unhindered development in this criminal case, because there is danger of being found in freedom, the same might escape or flee from criminal responsibility in this phase of the procedure, and the defendants if they are in a position to eliminate, hide, change or forge evidence of criminal work by influencing current witnesses and potential prosecution witnesses, as well as by taking into account the way and the circumstances in which criminal acts are allegedly committed, indicate that if defendants could be found at the same time as being able to repeat the criminal act and the same influence the investigation.
The defendants in this criminal case are suspected by the prosecution that at different times and places depending on interest and agreement, they have accepted and bribed different persons, then they have separated them. Also directly or indirectly, defendants have asked for and accepted benefits for themselves in order to act or not comply with official duty, specifically defendants have asked for bribes from mostly farmers, in order to put them on the list of profiters of subsidies, where they suspect that some of the farmers have entered the list by bribing money, with whom they have misused their official duty or official authority.
The sides have a right to a complaint against this decision at the Kosovo Court of Appeal.
