Polaska after the elections: Anger vote can hardly be turned into a pillar of development

Lawyer Dastid Pallaska has reacted after the outcome of the February 14th extraordinary elections. Through a Facebook text, Pallaska said the sovereign spoke freely and clearly. This is thanks to the exemplary organisation of elections by the CEC, which paradoxically confirms the lie of the “state captured” that most believed in”, he said. The package has [...]
Through a Facebook text, Pallaska said the sovereign spoke freely and clearly.
This is thanks to the exemplary organisation of elections by the CEC, which paradoxically confirms the lie of the “state captured” that most believed in”, he said.
Pallaska has added that the angry vote could hardly turn into a pillar of development, but that it says winners should congratulate victory at the invitation to create Government as soon as possible.
No excuses and no victimizations. Opposition parties should be congratulated on sincere reflection due to the specific importance they will have at the time when the country will be governed by a power with autocratic tendencies. Until the opposition is reflected, it is up to each citizen with liberal political conviction to make the opposition by limiting and holding the new power accountable with free speech and critical opinion”, Pallaska said.
Full text:
The Sovereign spoke freely and clearly. This is thanks to the exemplary organisation of elections by the CEC, which paradoxically confirms the lie of the <x0-state captured” that most believed in. Although the bitter vote can hardly be turned into a pillar of development, winners must congratulate victory at the invitation to create Government as soon as possible. No reasoning or sacrifice. Opposition parties should be congratulated on sincere reflection due to the specific importance they will have at the time when the country will be governed by a power with autocratic tendencies. Until the opposition reflects, it is up to each citizen with liberal political conviction to make the opposition by limiting and holding the new power accountable with free speech and critical opinion.











