Podujevo assassination, expert says an unknown profile was found at the scene DNA

This statement is charged by expert Mustafa at Thursday's session at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, in the case that the Sedat of Feptard Llugaliu brothers were charged with the death of the late Fahri Bunjak family in Podujevo in February 2016.

During his witness-quality hearing, expert Bashkim Mustafa stated that an unknown profile has been found, in which, according to him, no referenced sample for comparison and that that profile acquired is the profile of an unknown person.

In the question of injuryist Avdyl Bunnjak's question of what the expert's expertise regarding DNA finds, the witness stated that DNA profiles from the site's evidence have been extracted, which, according to him, been compared to the DNA profiles of Sedat Llugaliu, Feptard Llugaliu, Esat Llugaliu and Fahri Bulnjaku.

In question, three times the evidence in the DNA lab has come to a total of 49 evidence for analysis, all of these have been analysed and we have a lot of results in the end. We have DNA profiles coming up but we also have mixed or inappropriate partial profiles, and then we have evidence where it hasn't been identified. DNA at all and so on”, he said.

According to him from the FB1, FB2, FB4, E31.11.1, E31.14, VN24, VN28 and VN29 evidence has been released, which is consistent with Fahri Bunjak's DNA profile.

“from the EL2, EL4 and EL5 evidence, is extracting a DNA profile that matches the Esat Llugaliu DNA profile. From the ElL1 evidence, a mixed DNA profile is released, which is compatible with Esat Llugaliu and Fahri Bux1> said the expert.

He added that a mixed DNA profile has been extracted from the testimony, which is consistent with the Esat Llugaliu DNA profile and Fahri Bulnjak, meanwhile, from E31.4. is extracting a DNA profile from an unknown person.

In the question of the injured Bulnjak related to DNA expertise, that they claim these people were at the scene, the expert said it is not competent to determine whether to deal with the scene or not.

He added that the currently accused's profiles have not been adapted to any of the evidence.

“Sedas and Feptard Lulaguiu, their profiles have not been matched to any of the evidence offered for examination”, the expert said.

Regarding E30.2 evidence dealing with an axe tail found in car “Golf 4”, the damaged side demanded that the profile found in this testimony be clarified.

As to this, the expert stated that blood of human origin has been identified in this evidence, and a mixed DNA profile, which has been drawn up with Esat Llugal's DNA profiles and the Fahri Bunjak, has been released.

This testimony is linked to the T7 testimony, as the T7 testimony is a tampon with a light brown stain taken from red dots in E30.2” testimony, the expert added.

In a case prosecutor's question, Besa Limani, about some evidence of DNA has not been released, and what impacts the scientific aspect, the expert replied that it could affect the sample's small amount, as well as the impact of various factors that could harm the sample.

As factors, the expert said that heat, humidity, different chemicals, and many other factors can influence.

The expert in the court's question, Kujtim Krasniqi, how the washing of an ax of water could affect the water, the expert said it could affect the disappearance of all traces.

At the same time in the question about whether samples were taken on the critical day or later, the expert said he did not know exactly and that dates are part of the reports.

In the question of Judge Krasniqi, what could be the period of the extinction of samples, the expert said it depends on conservation factors.

“If well saved can stay long”, the witness added, reports “The Justice Trust”.

In the prosecutor's question of whether they own all the necessary equipment, the expert said that in the laboratory they have all the necessary equipment to perform the expertise.

“How long are the evidence stored, if it is necessary to develop expertise again? It was the judge's question, in which the expert said the samples are returned to the police and that you don't know what happens next to them.

And if there are any deadlines until there can be another expert, the expert stated that if well preserved, they can be examined.

Questions for the expert had no defenders of the accused, attorneys Guzim Kolqaku and Skender Musa.

The representative of the damaged party, lawyer Ahmet Tahiri, was also invited to this session, but the same was found not present for health reasons. In this regard, the injured Avdyl Bunnjak agreed that the hearing would continue without his presence.

During this hearing was also preceded by expert Fatmr Ademi, but the same had announced the court that I cannot present because it is in international training.

He through the announcement had declared that the Union expert Mustafa is the filetor of the report and could clarify everything about the case.

After this clarification, the injured and prosecutor gave up his hearing, and the court made a decision with which he considered the decision to listen to witness Fatmir Ademi's quality.

On the other hand, the chairman of the trial's shame, Judge Kujtim Krasniqi, announced the parties that the court has acted on the proposal of the damaged side for the security of mapping, but the company “Vala” has not yet responded, while “Z- Mobile” has claimed that these numbers are not of this company.

The judge also announced that, under the prosecutor's proposal, they had submitted to the Kosovo Agency of Forenzice video . . The country's tapes of the event for clarification, but still have no answer.

Krasniqi said that he cannot proceed with this session without accepting even these evidence, so the session was postponed on March 18, 2020, by 10:00.

Otherwise, the Constitutional Court in Pristina, on July 30th 2019, had convicted the accused of serious murder, Sedat Llugaliu, while releasing his brother, Feptard Llugaliu, from that charge.

Indictee Sedat Llugaliu, for criminal work “severe murder”, was sentenced to 18 years in effective prison, while declared innocent of the illegal weapons prosecution for which his brother, Feyrad Llugal, was sentenced to effective prison for three years and six months.

Meanwhile, for criminal work “heavy murder”, accused Feitard Llugaliu had been acquitted, since according to the court led by Judge Valbona Musliu-Selimaj, it had not been confirmed that the same was committed by this criminal act.

But with such a decision, the Bunnjak family, which through its representative, lawyer Tome Gashi, had demanded from the Court of Appeals that against the accused Sedat Llugaliu, be pronounced a maximum or life sentence, while his brother, released from murder charges, be convicted.

With the first-instance ruling, even the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, who through his complaint against this act, had demanded that this case be turned into a retrial because of essential violations of legal provisions, misconception of the actual situation, violation of criminal law, and of the verdict.

The prosecution had proposed that against convicts Sedat Llugaliu be pronounced a harsher sentence, while acquitted of Feitard Llugaliu to be convicted by law.

Meanwhile, innocence for his defense had been sought by the Court of Appeals, defender of the convicted Sedat Llugaliu, lawyer Guzim Kolqaku.

According to him, the first-degree court has described material rather than material evidence, but it has not reasoned to that extent so that each evidence can show what they have proved.

He had proposed to the court that, in the absence of evidence his defense be acquitted of the prosecution, or the case be turned into retrial.

At the same time, he was pleased with the first degree act, the defender of the accused Felar Llugaliu, lawyer Skender Musa.

The Court of Appeals had turned the case into retrial, acquiessing the prosecution's complaint.

According to the indictment, set up on April 5, 2017, the Llugaliu brothers on February 7th 2016, around 21:40, on the path of the late Fahri Bunnjak, to the path of “Giami” in Poduy), following the preliminary agreement between defendants and NN persons, with the intent to deprive the dead man of life now, of revenge for the previous conflicts of the Lugaliu family and Bunjaks about business, endangering Arafat Feta, the defendants have come out of Phoe and Bunjak.

According to the indictment, Esat Llugaliu fired a gun at them and shot NN's men and defendants Feptard and Sadat Llugaliu who came out of their car, while NN persons were hiding in the corner of a building.

To escape the shooting, the indictment says that Feta is out of the car and is gone, and now the late Fahri Bünjak has been shot by fire and in that condition has escaped from the car, but after the shooting has not stopped in self-defense has fired on them and fled to the house of the injured Halit Kika.

For these actions, Pristina's Constitutional Prosecutorship charges the accused with criminal acts “serious murder”. /Betimy for Justice