A month of N.K. detention that sexually violated minors in Prizren

The Court's media communiqué reportedly said that while the minor was alone in the house, the N.K had entered her house twice daily and then forced her to have sex.

In the afternoon and again in the late evening hours, within the same day, until the minor victim found herself alone in the house, the defendant uses the convenient moment to step into her home and publicly punchs her in the face, forces her to strip, and without her consent forces her to engage in sexual relations”, says the media communique.

While the Constitutional Court in Prizren, the Department of Criminals, has approved Prizren's request for the appointment of the detention measure, against the N.K. defendants, due to the alleged alleged criminal act: violation by Article 227 money. 4 points 4.8 over par. 1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo.

Procedure Judge Ayser Skyker, the state prosecutor's request for the appointment of the detention action against the defendants, has approved it as a solid basis of the KPPRK provisions, and the same has been assigned the length of detention measure of (1) months, so that the defendant's move will be counted from the date 02.02,2021 to the date 04,03,2021.

The court, in case of detention against indictees N.K., has estimated that there are legal reasons for the appointment of a pre-meditation move, and from evidence collected until this stage, comes suspicion that the critical day the defendant is suspected to have committed the criminal offence to the minor-age victim.

The court has estimated that the legal conditions for the detention assignment have been met, because investigations into this case have just begun, following the procedure should be heard, the defendant, the witnesses, as well as other evidence should be collected, so is the court's conclusion that the detention assignment is reasonable, and necessary for the normal course of this criminal procedure.

The court, deciding on the request for the detention assignment, took into account other alternative measures, but considers that the same are not enough and certain for the security of the defendants' presence in the procedure to clarify the circumstances of which there is doubt that the defendant committed the criminal act, which is placed on him and specifically when investigations into this criminal case are in the initial phase.

Note: Against that decision, the dissatisfied side has a right to complaint, through the Constitutional Court in Prizren, the Court of Appeals in Pristina. The complaint does not suspend the execution of this act.