10 minutes agoThe Court of Appeals rejects the Foundation's decision to suspend the work of “Kelkos”
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The Constitutional Court..., on December 8th of last year, had decided to suspend the company's work “Kelcos Energy” sh.p.k. For the plants in Decan. This court had decided to postpone the execution of permits and licenses that the Ministry of Economy and Environment and Energy Regulatory Office had given to the private company “Kelkos Energy” [...]
In contrast, the Court of Appeals, which on January 28th, has rejected the fundamental decision.
In the reasoning given, the Court of Appeals has shown why he has accepted the complaint of indictees as based.
“The Court of Appeals as a second-instance court, following the assessment of complaints concerning the amended bias and the complete assessment of the subject documents, in support of the provision of the 94, 208 and 209 of the Law on Conflict Procedure (LPK), applicable under Article 63 of the Law for Administrative Conflicts and Article 49 of the Law has found that: The complaint of the indictees is based<2>, the act states.
At the same time, it is pointed out that by considering the ruling on the limits of the complaint claims, the Court of Appeals has resulted in the appeal claims of indictees, so the Court of Appeals, initiated by this state of affairs, estimates that the outcome and position of the first-instance court, about the manner of deployment, is not fair and legal.
Full decision:
