Appeal makes decision for the person calling for the burning of the presidency and the Constitutional

He was accused of using his profile on the social network “Facebook”, through a post, had called for the burning of former President Hashim Thaci's office and the head of the Constitutional Court, Arta Hajrizi-Rama, reports “Justice Vowtim”.

For this crime, the Constitutional Court in Pristina, in October last year, had sentenced G.M. to one year in prison on bail, with a period of verification of two years.

To the first - century ruling, within the legal deadline, he had filed complaints against the defender of the accused G. M, lawyer Mahmut Halimi.

However, the Appeals Prosecutor had asked Apel to refuse the defense complaint and prove the complaint of complaint.

Under the decision, provided by “Justice Vow”, issued on December 24, 2020, results in Appeals analyzing the complaint claims of defence and finding that the same are groundless, arguing that the pronounced sentence was in proportion to the weight of criminal acts and the purpose of punishment.

“The Court of Appeals, after analyzing the complaints of the defendant's defense Gzim Murati, lawyer Mahmut Halimi found that the same are groundless because for all these cited circumstances, the first degree court's complaints took into account during the measurement of the type and height of the sentence, and that the same sentence is in proportion to the weight of the criminal work and the purpose of sentence”, the Apel decision is said.

Apel has found that the first - degree court, on the occasion of the sentence, had assessed all the circumstances affecting the type and height of the sentence.

“The Court of Appeals finds that, the first degree court in the complaint court, on the occasion of the conviction's appointment, assessed all the circumstances which affect the type and height of the sentence, as an extenuating circumstance for the accused, in view of the degree of criminal responsibility, where the accused even by the Institute of Psychic Forenzikes's report, is considered to be essentially reduced responsibility that implies his criminal responsibility of a much lower level than that of a head who is fully accountable, the Apelle.

At the end of that decision, the sentence pronounced against accused G is said to be on trial. The M will influence the resocialisation and reformation of the perpetrators and the prevention of other persons from committing criminal acts.

Otherwise, this case had first gone into treatment at the Department of Foundation Crimes in Mitrovica, but Judge Bekim Veliqi, who had been divided, with the decision of July 7, 2020, had declared this court not competent, arguing that according to Article 18 of the Court Law, competent to try the substances that fall into the competence of the PSRK, is the Special Department of the Foundation Court in Pristina.

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Mitrovica on 22 June 2020 had filed charges against G.M., claiming that the accused on May 29, 2020, about 11:00 in Mitrovica, with the aim of organising the terrorist work through the social network “Facebook” has published its comment “at last came the day people brought me the office of President Thaci and the Constitutional Court, Arta Hajrizi-Rama. If the people did this to you, then we are the most illiterate, coward, most treacherous and corrupt humanity in the Balkans”, and this comment has been distributed on electronic media on the “Indexline”