He took advantage of thousands of Euros, Ferizaj Court gives details to suspected police

The Foundation Court in Ferizaj has approved Ferizaj's Constitutional Prosecutor's request for the appointment of the detention move against K.K. indictees. Police officers and defendants, F.R., due to suspicion based on their committing guilty acts. While refusing to apply for the detention measure against indictees B.R. i [...]
There is a well-based doubt that defendant K.K. in May 2017, he received a non-proportional amount of money in exchange for the money given in the service by exploiting the other person's plight in the way he gave him 20,000 euros before F.M. for monthly interest of 3 %, which has paid interest every month from 600 to 800 euros, profiting a total of 17800 euros, and the obligation to return the principal debt to many of the 20,000 euros, for which it has been forced to receive another 15,000 euros in interest from a person named J. Who lives in the state of Norway, suffer property damage of over 30,000 euros.
Defendant F.R. Ferizaj has allegedly accepted a non-proportional amount of money in exchange for the money given in the service, so that at intervals within 2017-2018 he has paid 22,000 euros in service to the affected F.M., profiting wealth in many of the 24.300 euros and the obligation to return the main debt. During 2017-2018, however, he is suspected of accepting a non - proportional amount of money in exchange for money given in the ministry, in a way that in some cases he has given 7,000 euros in the service of injured A. N, profiting wealth in many of the 3,500 euros, as well as the obligation to return the principal debt by profiting over 27,800 euros.
The defendant B.R. It is alleged that in April 2018 at Ferizaj, he received a non - proportional amount of money in exchange for the money given in the service, in the way he gave 10,000 euros in the service of the affected A.N., profiting wealth in many of 3,000 euros, as well as the obligation to pay back the principal debt”, the court report said.
This case, the parties are reportedly complaining against this act did not postpone his execution.












